Talk:Sadeness (Part I)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:EnigmaSadeness.jpg[edit]

Image:EnigmaSadeness.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:55, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The translation is flawed.

Examples:

_____________________________________

"(Latin) Procedamus in pace, In nomine Christi, Amen

(Translation) Let us go forth in peace, In the name of Christ, So be it"


"(Latin) Procedamus in pace, In nomine Christi, Amen

(Translation) Shall we proceed in peace, In the name of Christ, Amen"


These two original lines are identical, but the translations are not. Why not?


(Translation) Lift up ye heads o ye glorious gates, And be ye lifted up ye everlasting doors..."

I don't have any idea what this might mean. It seems the translator has tried to reach some kind of olden, artistic style. The problem is, it hardly makes any sense.

Also, in the first case, "amen" is translated (correctly) as "so be it", but in the others it's left intact. I guess I'll make some minor changes here and there, but as I don't speak either Latin of French, there's not much I can do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.193.13.15 (talk) 22:17, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Single releases[edit]

Tha article appears to show that the single was on CD only in the UK, and only on vinyl in France. It was of course available on 7" vinyl in the UK, on Virgin DINS 101 - see my image http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=Ts9LJhS --Julesomega (talk) 21:20, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

number one in 24 countries?[edit]

There reads: it became an international smash hit, reaching number one in 24 countries and the top ten in many others
So, why does the chart section only have 15 countries listed with #1 position? If there is nine more, why not put them there too? 85.76.169.72 (talk) 23:57, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Currently there are 19 number one countries in the list, in which there are 16 different countries. (US and Netherlands have two entries, and Europe is not a country). The table has 20 countries (+Europe) with top 10 chart place. Additionally Canada and Netherlands have one more top ten, US four more (so US had five top ten places with this one song...). Though the claim still has after few years, the tag [citation needed] 109.240.230.91 (talk) 03:09, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited the claim to match the information actually in the article - number one in 14 countries (I removed Japan as it was uncited, not in the charts section, and I couldn't find any sources myself). I looked through the edit history and found it was originally added to the article in July 2011 by an anonymous editor who had in an series of edits with no edit summaries, expanded the lede from one sentence to a paragraph. This is a prime example of where editors should remember to be bold and removed unsourced material - and speaking of, anyone looking to source the 24 countries claim, take care! You will find sites and articles claiming this, but you will also find that their source was the erroneous information on Wikipedia. There is a risk of citogenesis. H. Carver (talk) 21:22, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sadeness (Part I). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:56, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sadeness (Part I). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sadeness_(Part_I)&oldid=1201764018"