Talk:Case-based reasoning

Robotics Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Logic / Ethics Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic
	Ethics

Untitled[edit]

This entry is incorrect. Not just a bit off, but completely so. CBR was around years before Alice (in 1988, 3 years before Alice, Jaime Carbonell had a paper on it). Any objections to deleting this entry until someone can properly research it?

Zippy 23:32 Feb 24, 2003 (UTC)

I just found that there's already a much better entry for "Case based reasoning" - redirecting this entry to that one.

Zippy 04:18 Feb 26, 2003 (UTC)

Hi, Can u tell me then what is this mean?

http://pandorabots.com/pandora/talk?botid=c96f911b3e35f9e1

What do u think about it? Is there somebody online at the other end? Or is it an example of "Case-based reasoning" ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

Neither. It's a simple "bot" that can respond to a small number of pre-programmed questions. It's nothing complex like CBR. 86.174.124.26 (talk) 16:48, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should relate this subject to Instance-based learning and vice versa.

Hestad (talk) 21:08, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio?[edit]

I recognise the example about Fred and his blueberry pancake recipe. Isn't it from Kolodner? Has it been sufficiently (or at all) rephrased? 86.174.124.26 (talk) 16:48, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Case-based reasoning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030402185429/http://www.nupedia.com:80/article/465/ to http://www.nupedia.com/article/465/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:20, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Definition of term is too unclear[edit]

I am deeply dissatisfied with this article because it doesn't define "case-based reasoning" precisely enough to distinguish it from other data-based artificial intelligence techniques in general. If someone could write the precise distinguishing characteristics of "case-based reasoning" I would appreciate it a lot. (I also want to write Textual case-based reasoning, so I'll need some background). Duckmather (talk) 18:42, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Diagrams in french?[edit]

The diagrams that this article presents appear to be labelled in french, meaning that they are not very useful for presumably most users of the english wikipedia. Are there alternatives of the appropriate language? MinimumViablePerson (talk) 02:29, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]