Talk:Dorney

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire articles

River Thames (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames articles

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dorney is still in Buckinghamshire[edit]

According to my map (Ordnance Survey 1:50000 sheet 175), the village of Dorney is still in Buckinghamshire. The border runs between Dorney and Eton Wick (which is in Berkshire), and then around the west side of Slough. -- Chris j wood 12:14, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)

For the definitive answer I've just called the Centre for Buckinghamshire Studies and they have confirmed that it's just within the county of Buckinghamshire, not Berkshire. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 12:30, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)

There are plenty of places with an inappropriate post town by the Thames — Hampton Wick and Egham Hythe also have completely the wrong county under the traditional postal counties fortunately these have been solved by local government changes. Without reading your excellent point, I have clarified why it is an anomaly, as this confuses people no end, especially those who were advised by outposts of the rather ridiculous, 1960s cheapened, system of Royal Mail.

Anglicanism - lack of census info[edit]

This is always a shame to see where in small places there's a danger of a great structure being left empty - could anyone find any stats for this ecclesiastical parish or even civil parish? I hate to blame people, but any other religion, including Shia/Sunni denominations should fully blame the ONS. - Adam37 Talk 20:03, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dorney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120424060625/http://list.english-heritage.org.uk/mapsearch.aspx to http://list.english-heritage.org.uk/mapsearch.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:01, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]