Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comb over

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comb over was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to keep.

Amusing dicdef, but a dicdef nonetheless. How 'bout a nice transwiki? - Lucky 6.9 01:36, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)

  • There's already a pre-existing entry at wiktionary. I think it's possible that this could be expanded beyond a dicdef. Maximus Rex 08:27, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • It has possibilities to explain changes in fashion and its replacement with the "buzz cut", which makes it encyclopedic. keep Dunc_Harris| 09:03, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Merge with hairstyle or baldness and redirect. Also, change spelling to combover. Exploding Boy 09:41, Jul 21, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. With work, this could become a nice encyclopedic article about a very common hairstyle. Kevyn 13:04, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Has potential for an encyclopedic entry on its cultural signifigance. -FZ 13:34, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Sounds good to me. Let's move it to cleanup. Who knows? Maybe we have a future featured article here. :^P - Lucky 6.9 17:04, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. It's a stub, not a deletion candidate. Bacchiad 18:01, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Surely there's potential for expansion here? I'll add acouple more notables. Noisy 00:06, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. If USA Today can have an article on Giuliani's switch from combover to slickback, then it's encyclopedic. I would definitely nominate this for article of the week once it survives vfd. - DropDeadGorgias (talk) 18:02, Jul 23, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.