Talk:Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Song of Sidney Sussex[edit]

Looking for sources of this I found a couple of verses on the college website but the only source I can find for the whole thing is this musical score, a copy of which is held in the University Library, which I will endeavour to check sometime. 143.159.210.215 (talk) 13:01, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've found the score in the UL, and have photos of all ten verses. I'll try and put a photo of it here on the talk page; I hope that won't cause copyright issues (surely it's old enough to be out of it by now???). I also have the musical score should anyone want it for whatever reason. (SeamusLeahey (talk) 22:34, 18 December 2016 (UTC))[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by SeamusLeahey (talkcontribs) 22:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A note[edit]

Should Sandra Dawson (Master) be listed as Dame rather than Professor (what has the priority)? The Judge institute pages list her title as Dame:

Dame Sandra Dawson

Based on this I propose changing the title to Dame.

"Professor Dame Sandra Dawson" would be normal, I think; "Dame Sandra Dawson" will do though, I suppose.
James F. (talk) 11:40, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Hmm, the college paper refers to her full title as: Professor Dame Sandra Dawson, DBE, which is probably even more abnormal. Everywhere else seems to list her as Dame (compare recent google hits and papers). Shall we go we that then? --HispanoCelt 14:41, Sep 24, 2004 (UTC)

The motto "Dieu me garde de calumnie" is clearly medieval French, not Latin as stated. Can we fix that?

Everyone can change that, so please be bold and do it! — Richie 22:53, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I worked out how to do it, so I did.
I've changed it to Middle French just to be more precise, this might be overly specific though so feel free to change it back 143.159.210.215 (talk) 14:13, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The organisation of this page seems to me to be very poor. There's a collection of various pieces of information, some of which are clearly trivia. Then there's a contents section - and then hardly anything! Surely, for a start, the contents should be at the top? I'm inclined to change it all round to make more sense, but I'm not an expert on Sidney Sussex College and this task would surely be better done by someone who could bring more to it - perhaps a fellow or student of the college.

Image copyright problem with File:Cecil Frank Powell.jpg[edit]

The image File:Cecil Frank Powell.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:19, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image[edit]

I'm planning to change the main image of chapel court. It's wonky, badly angled, and shows patchy grass which is no longer patchy. Unless there are objections I'll do this in the few days. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.102.157.73 (talk) 15:20, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now done.
Lightbluemug (talk) 14:45, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed the main photo for Sidney to one I took myself; the old one seemed a bit grey and grim to me. Quality's not ace, because I took it with my phone, but I think it's an improvement. (SeamusLeahey (talk) 22:40, 18 December 2016 (UTC))[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:50, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]