Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kol Zimrah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close ; no activity on this discussion page in over 6 years. Non-admin closure. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:51, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is one of hundreds of non-famous Jewish prayer groups that are moving towards songful services with wide participation. A mention in The Forward does not make this group famous. Delete. JFW | T@lk 20:17, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Keep. I agree that an article on one congregation is very difficult to justify, but the movement for a a music centered service is damned interesting as sociology. Can we find a clever way accommodate this please? -- orthogonal 23:56, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- This was initiated by Rabbi Shlomo Carlebach, famous in the seventies for pioneering Jewish song-based services. It would have to go in the article about him, which does not exist yet. JFW | T@lk 16:49, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
How is this different from an article on an individual synagogue? We have articles on individual churches, why not this? RickK 20:11, Jul 14, 2004 (UTC)
- This is not a synagogue. They have a website, which they are advertising on Wikipedia, but it is an informal group (like many minyanim), which can meet anywhere. JFW | T@lk 16:49, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
~~Abstain:~~ It's not clear whether this is a synagogue or a prayer group. If the former, keep. If the latter, it needs to spread a bit before inclusion, I'd say. I'm in favor of significant churches being included, but I'd say they need to be significant. This one has novelty, if it's a synagogue. Geogre 13:53, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- See above.
- Delete: If it's a group that roves, it needs to spread some more & gain distinction/adherents. Geogre 03:07, 17 Jul 2004 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.