Talk:Charles Wood, 2nd Viscount Halifax

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Catholic== I added the information on his service to the Catholic Church in England, I'll see if I can add more stuff later, though considering the relative un-importance of this article I might forget all together. --Robgea 03:41, 11 May 2005 (UTC)Robgea[reply]

File:2ndViscountHalifax.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:2ndViscountHalifax.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:22, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Courtenay inescutcheon of pretence[edit]

I cannot see why Fox-Davies in Armorial Families (see [1]) shows the arms of Charles Lindley Wood, 2nd Viscount Halifax (1839-1934) with an inescutcheon of pretence of Courtenay. Inescutcheons of pretence are used where a man has married a heraldic heiress, that is a woman who is her father's heir and who therefore has no surviving brothers. This was not the case with Lady Agnes Elizabeth Courtenay (1838-1919), the wife of Charles Lindley Wood, 2nd Viscount Halifax (1839-1934) and the daughter of William Reginald Courtenay, 11th Earl of Devon (1807-1888). She did have a surviving brother, namely Edward Baldwin Courtenay, 12th Earl of Devon (1836-1891), who succeeded his father as Earl of Devon. Fox-Davies may have this wrong (he gave the bride's father incorrectly as the "12th Earl"). Sources should not be relied on blindly without an assessment of their correctness. Am I missing something here?(Lobsterthermidor (talk) 12:50, 17 August 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Personal life[edit]

The link fir Lord Halifax’s Ghost Book just links back to itself. Should it just be dropped? Susie Brooke (talk) 19:20, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]