Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiki-time
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Postdlf 23:01, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Wiki-time[edit]
Looks like a neologism, and doesn't have any meaning different from "wiki" + "time", so I don't recommend transiki-ing to wiktionary. Kappa 01:16, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Wikiholic. -- BDAbramson thimk 02:04, 2005 May 2 (UTC)
- Delete. Neologism, dicdef. Quale 02:14, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Mr. Paul Morrison ;-) - Svest 04:21, May 2, 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Wikiholic. Megan1967 05:24, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A quick google does turn up uses of the phrase "wiki-time," but with enough inconsistancy of meaning and context to suggest that it doesn't have any commonly accepted meaning. (And, of course, even if it did, the appropriate place for it would be wiktionary.) --Jacobw 14:49, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This seems to be a neologism. Maybe a delete could be prudent. --SuperDude 06:06, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not encyclopedic and not needed. Wikiholics and many wiki users will know what it means without an entry.--WCFrancis 18:50, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not worth directing to Wikiholic. StuTheSheep 02:33, May 8, 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.