Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page and give them ==A Descriptive Header==. If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia and frequently asked questions.
If you leave a comment for me, I will respond on your talk page.
Old messages may be archived or have the title striked, labeling them to me as inactive.
If you are replying to a message, and the title is striked, please unstrike it to bring it to my attention. Please also do not reply to archived messages, but instead create a new topic on the main talk page.
Hello, Barneyboo. Thanks for your note on the New user log. We could use an expert on home shopping channels; looks like you've found your niche. Have fun! Chris Roy 21:41, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Ah, thanks for the typo fix. (You know it's time to stop editing articles and go to bed when...) Aranel 03:20, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Np dude :) I'm just borrrrrred so editing typos is like FUN to me right now :/ BB
That's fine, everything's free on Wikipedia! --Joe D 11:50, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Hey Barneyboo, I accidentally overwrote your edit in the Shenyang article earlier today. (I just noticed while reviewing the history.) Sorry about that. I see your point about being more NPOV, so I will rephrase that section to try to make it better. Cheers --DV 06:52, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Not a problem - it's the nature of Wikipedia after all! Barneyboo 10:02, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Although my RfA is not over yet, I figured that since so many people voted before it had been posted, I may as well start thanking people before it wraps up. It'll take me that long to thank everyone who voted anyway! Thank you, Barneyboo, for your support - I'll do my best as an admin to make the reality of Wikipedia rise to the level of the dream. BD2412T 23:43, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I'm hoping to convince you that the entry on "Stephen Goodfellow" is not a vanity article and might be reinstated.
The article in Wikipedia was brought to my attention a few months ago, since it was a direct reference to me, I enlarged on it.
As to Jamie's curt (if not a little humorous) reference, my notability may be almost insignificant to the larger world, but can make claim to the creation of the Micropointillist medium and can drag a plethora of poor unsuspecting witnesses to attest to that fact. The few other minor achievements may be of even smaller stature, but perhaps worthy of note to some web archeologist in the far future.
A google search of my name ought to dredge up some stuff.
I can be reached at esteban@goodfelloweb.com - please put 'wikipedia' in the subject - I got a LOT of spam.
Happy new Year!
Sincerely,
Stephen Goodfellow
Thanks for taking the time to contact me, Stephen. I've done some further research, and I still stand by my original vote. Your appeal to me is rather contradictory. Notability is a major point of contention in Wikipedia, mainly becauase we're all on the look-out for the smallest bit of opinion, or point of view in articles, and deciding whether or not an article is 'notable' is inherently subjective, unless the entire community can agree to a strict criteria (whether that's alexa rankings, google page rank etc. etc.) So, when you say my notability may be almost insignificant to the larger world, that's really just a straight admission that it won't meet many people's criteria for inclusion, based on notability. Likewise, being able to quote a handful of people that you were the brain behind Micropointillism is fine, but not as an argument for inclusion in Wikipedia, where wider awareness is expected. A Google search on your claim to fame shows less than 200 hits, and a number of them are pages on your own site. Barneyboo (Talk) 12:36, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Don't blank out pages that you don't like. Kalmia 08:56, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think it was more than necessary when you choose to vandalise user pages, which previously did not exist. Barneyboo (Talk) 13:50, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I was wondering if you could pitch in a comment in any direction you feel but I believe this man is very notable having Authored such books as The Creature from Jekyll Island a history of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, but also many many more films as well, also being a member of many organisations.
Me being an inclusionist of sorts I would rather see changes made rather than a wholesale deletion, what do you think?
The man is very notable he has been doing this sort of work since the 60’s when he created the “The Capitalist Conspiracy” one of the first and most documented histories of Political Corruption in film that I know of.
Thank you for all your help, I’m just starting out in Wikipedia I have created the Benjamin H. Freedman, article and reconstructed the The Money Masters article and some others but I need help here!
Any help of mine you may need or want in any regard in the future just ask :)
Also any contribution you would like to make to improve the article please consider!
Really i wouldn't ask if i did not really think this article worthy.
hi. nice page you got there. btw i imported the pessimist tag from your page. it applies to me also. thanx. Keops1988 14:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You may be interested in User:Audacity/Userboxes/WSPQ, which is a replacement for the old Political Chart userbox. The new userbox takes the two variables (economic and personal freedom), calculates which political alignment they place you into (Statist, Libertarian, Liberal, Centrist, or Conservative), and links your userpage to the appropriate category.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:E4spoof.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:E4spoof.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ch4original.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Ch4original.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
I have nominated Magic Pink, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic Pink. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Dicklyon (talk) 06:52, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Grrme2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool(talk) 20:44, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, User:Barneyboo. I have noticed from your user page that you are a fan of or have an interest in The Smurfs series. There is currently a discussion concerning the merging of all individual articles on Smurf video games into one bigger article. I do not believe that any of the editors involved in the discussion (myself included) know much about the games and I was hoping you could provide us with the benefit of your opinion as an editor knowledgeable about the subject. If you are not interested in helping or if you believe yourself incapable at this time then please disregard this message. The discussion is currently under way here. Thanks for your time. -Thibbs (talk) 21:37, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Barneyboo, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Staffwaterboy and I would like to thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~), which are produced by clicking on the button; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Also, I think that you might want to join the the adopt-a-user project, where advanced editors can guide you in your first experiences here; so check it out if you want. Again, welcome!
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Barneyboonov.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:00, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Barneyboo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Barneyboo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Progpink.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:47, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Ch4original.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10... 100... 200
