Talk:The Idiot

Novels High‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

Name of the consumptive[edit]

The article lists the consumptive's name as Ippolit. However, I read the Carlisle translation, which calls him Hippolite. Someone keeps reverting my edits when I list this as an alternate spelling. As it's a transliteration, can we cede that there may not be a definitive spelling? Bkatcher (talk) 21:43, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bkatcher: You make a valid point. It might be an idea to include some sort of table, something like what appears here, as Ippolit is not the only character with alternatives, and indeed "Hippolite" is not the only alternative for Ippolit. My reasons for reverting your change were:

it follows the majority of translations and almost all secondary source commentary
it is a transliteration and transcription from the Russian
the article consistently refers to the character as Ippolit
the character is never referred to anywhere - in primary, secondary or tertiary sources - as "Ippolit (or Hippolite)", he is simply one or the other, usually Ippolit. The characters section relates to and extends other discussion of the characters in the article, so putting in a bracketed alternative seems to me to complicate matters unnecessarily. Harold the Sheep (talk) 01:31, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The character list already includes at least one alternative name: Prince Shch. (or Prince S) Bkatcher (talk) 01:42, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

True, but he is a minor character who is not discussed anywhere else in the article. Personally I'd prefer one or the other. Harold the Sheep (talk) 02:07, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Portrait of Nastasya[edit]

I changed the word „photograph“ to „portrait“ in the plot section. I think it’s unlikely that it was a photograph. 2001:9E8:290:ED00:40EB:E759:5E60:42C1 (talk) 18:00, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is a photograph in the novel. Harold the Sheep (talk) 22:22, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Link to the Wikisource?[edit]

I don't know how to edit in source so I'll leave this here for now, I might try to add it in source later. TophatGuy14 (talk) 00:05, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

huh? Harold the Sheep (talk) 05:18, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]