Talk:Abalone (board game)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mathematical analysis[edit]

is there mathematical analysis of this game?

Xah P0lyglut 07:55, 2003 Nov 29 (UTC)

Defensive Play[edit]

I am skeptical of the recent edits regarding the potential for defensive play. Given that this may be a controverial topic, I would like to open a discussion here rather than expressing my opinion by directly editing the article.

My main objection is that it seems both POV and beside the point to say that good players are more aggressive and that defensive play is a sign of a weaker player. It is my understanding that among Abalone-lovers it is a social convention not to play defensively, because defensive play makes the game boring. In particular I understand that playing defensively is not shunned because it is unsound strategy that can be beaten by a competent offense.

Perhaps it is true that people who flout this social convetion tend to be newer to the game and therefore weaker players. Perhaps no one who is interested in playing Abalone seriously would be happy with an infinitely drawn out game with no chance of winning. But these facts even if true reflect on the psychology of the players of Abalone, not on the game itself.

There is a critical point of information that needs to be clarified, apart from psychology and apart from social convention: In the diagrammed position, can Black defend indefinitely against all White attacks? If Black does not make any mistakes, is the fortress of marbles secure against even a perfect attack by White? I believe the answer is yes, and if it is yes then this fact about the game dynamics per se needs a prominent mention.

I propose splitting the current paragraph about defensive play into two paragraphs. Let one paragraph make it clear that a defensively-minded player who makes no mistakes not only can't be beaten, but also can't even be forced out of the defensive wedge, and therefore not losing at Abalone takes only moderate skill and no imagination. Let a separate paragraph make it clear that serious players find ways to attack and counterattack and to enjoy Abalone despite the theoretical possibility of draws. Does this sound fair enough? --Fritzlein 22:27, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Re: Defensive Play[edit]

I also think there's nothing to do against a defensive player who doesn't make any mistake. Though, in variants such as the daisies ("Marguerite"), where both groups of marbles are split in two at the beginning, nobody knows (for the moment, at least) if a "perfect" play would lead to a draw (like in Standard opening), or to the win of one of the players (maybe Black). Moreover, the complex configuration at the beginning isn't easy to handle, and it's not easy to reach a stable position, if your opponent doesn't want to : if you try to reach such a position, rather than to get an advantage, the repartition of the marbles generally allows your opponent to eject some of your marbles in the meantime, and you may find yourself stable but with less marbles, and thus quite weak. From my own experience, I'll say that you cannot be safe by playing in a defensive way in these variants; in fact, being "defensive" or "aggressive" makes much less sense than it does in Standard games. Defensive would qualify the one who tends to stop the attack when he gets an advantage (to avoid intricate fights), and then to solidify his group of marbles.

This is the reason why the upcoming On Line World Championship of Abalone will be played in Belgian daisy.

AB, October 1st 2005

"Belgian"[edit]

Is the Belgian tournament starting position that in image Image:Abalone_belgian.svg? If so, include the image in the article. Also, the "In this player's experience..." is inappropriate phrasing. AnonMoos 14:48, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is a picture of the Belgian daisy starting configuration.
Lmkhjsfdg (talk) 15:22, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Abalone board.jpg[edit]

Image:Abalone board.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:06, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Terminology[edit]

The instruction booklet for the game has a list of vocabulary. Has anyone considered posting it in the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.181.160.60 (talk) 19:37, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Abalone (board game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:58, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Abalone_(board_game)&oldid=1197830312"