User talk:Sfrantzman

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Graham ☺ | Talk 14:12, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Your edits on Campus SuperStar

Hi Sfrantzman, Cleanup on Campus SuperStar are reverted by some users who claimed that these edits are 'disturbing' to them. I have been trying to clean up on the article too but seems to receive attacks. Could you also share you thoughts on the cleanup of Campus SuperStar on its talk page? Cocoma 15:33, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Chili/Chile Powder

It definitely has the signs of a joke article that is there just to confuse. Regardless, I don't know one way or another. I suppose it was a good idea to merge it, until new, verifiable evidence comes through and proves the article true or false.

Tumble-Weed 08:55, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

David Yudelman

Hi. I've nominated David Yudelman, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created on August 18, where you can improve it if you see fit. Cheers, Bookandcoffee 20:02, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

DYK

On 23 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article David Yudelman, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Peta 03:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Maurice Benayoun

I just did some work on this article, but I should have looked in more detail at the history before, rather than after doing so. I removed the multiple headings as part of a cleanup, and I can see that you had added them in for same reason! Many apologies. I'll have another look at the article structure.--Ethicoaestheticist 12:20, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

W.R. Grace and Company

If William Russell Grace died in 1904, and J. Peter Grace was born in 1913, how could this statement be true:

"During the Second World War Peter Grace, W.R. Grace's son took control of the company."

Cryogenic freezing?

Your query about citations

Hi. Got your e-mail requesting information and help. Citations on Wikipedia are something I struggle with even as a veteran user. Believe me, there really needs to be better documentation about it. On the bright side, a good starting point is Wikipedia:Citing_sources. It has some good advice and links to other pages that will help. At the bottom in the list of links are links to citation templates. I try to use some of them, but it really ends up being a exercise in frustration. Your best bet is to use that page as a resource, and also take a look at the well sourced pages and Good Articles (that is, the source code of them) as examples of what to do. Best of luck! --Lendorien 05:57, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

List of massacres

The recent discussions about this page are in Talk:List of events named massacres/Archive 3 and a more shorter version of the same debate can be seen at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of massacres . The trouble we have had is that there is no tight definition for the word massacre, so anyone can call any killing of two or more people a massacre. But as the word has connotations of a morally bad thing to do it tends to be used as terrorism is used (see WP:words to avoid#Extremist, terrorist and freedom fighter).

So rather than try to define what a massacre is the way the list is now being developed is only to include incidents that are documented in verifiable third party reliable sources. As the introduction now says accusations of massacre as often tell you as much about the accuser as the accused.

I removed the old list because it was full of original research it is still available at User:Philip Baird Shearer/List of massacres so that anyone who wishes to lookup old list as an aid memoir, but please do not import any events into the new list unless you can finds verifiable third party reliable sources that specifically state that an event was a massacre. There is no reason why other sources can not be added to the description of the event to cover specific details, but the drive is only to include incidents that are claimed to be massacres by reliable sources. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 16:38, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh yes the reason the list is still small is because it is very new see List of massacres Revision as of 07:51, 16 December 2007 --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 16:44, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Just so I understand. Are you intending to only include incidents that are known as a "massacre" in a third party text? This would include well known massacres such as the Sand Creek Massacre and I assume incidents such as the Sicilian Vespers which is known as a massacre(www.britannica.com/eb/article-9067619/Sicilian-Vespers). Can we also include on the list massacres that appear elsewhere in Wikipedia with the word 'Massacre' in the headline, such as the Sharpeville massacre?Seth J. Frantzman 11:55, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

I do not own the article. But I have worked on it on and off for several years. What was discussed on the talk page was that as there is no clear definition of what a massacre is. To appear in the list it must have a verifiable source. This means that not only must the source exist it must be reliable. Taking the Sand Creek Massacre as an example.

1. I moved the first instance to the talk page because I was not sure that the source ([1] ) was an official university page. The person who found the page was free to discuss it on the talk page and convince other editors that it is.
2. I tagged the second one (Staff. The Crow Creek Massacre www.nebraskastudies.org ) with {{verify credibility}} because the source may be more reliable than the first one, but if no other source was found after a day or so it should be removed.
3. But the new source (Heather Pringle, Crow Creek's Revenge, Science, 27 March, 1998) in my opinion meets the requirements. So I will not delete the article.

The citation must come from a reliable third party source. A Wikipedia link is not a reliable source. So the name of a wikipedia article is not sufficient to include it in the list of massacres there also has to be a reliable third party source. See also WP:PSTS, encyclopaedia articles are tertiary source, If a massacre is notable there ought to be some secondary sources that call it that and can be used to support the tertiary source. There is no reason why tertiary sources should not be used to provide extra details, but I think the substantial claim must come from a secondary sources. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 14:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

I have deleted the article you created called All massacres because it was a POV fork of List of massacres. Do not recreate it under that name or another name, but please do contribute to further development of the List of massacres article. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 23:54, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

James Finn

A tag has been placed on James Finn, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dustihowe  Talk  19:46, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Judah Halevi, mayor of Jaffa

A tag has been placed on Judah Halevi, mayor of Jaffa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Helpful One ^{(Talk) (Contributions) (Review Me!)} 13:38, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Judah Halevi, the Chief Rabbi of Jaffa, Judah halevi was the cheif rabbi of Jaffa in the 1880s.

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hebraic Political Studies.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hebraic Political Studies.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:28, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Silvia Berti

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Silvia Berti, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.hpstudies.org/20/article.aspx?articleid=12. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:01, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikiproject Academic Journals Collaboration notice

The current WikiProject Academic Journals Collaboration of the Week is Electrical Experimenter Please help to improve this article to the highest of standards.

AfD nomination of Saul H. Benjamin

I have nominated Saul H. Benjamin, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saul H. Benjamin. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 17:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Test

test

Your Creation of Ein Rafa

A tag has been placed on Ein Rafa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Letter of British Jews on 60th anniversary of Israel

I see you have attempted to make the article Letter of British Jews on 60th anniversary of Israel less POV. I think that that task is impossible. The sole existence of this article is POV. It seems to be an excuse to state controversial statements like: 'they cannot celebrate the birthday of a country "that even now engages in ethnic cleansing, that violates international law, that is inflicting a monstrous collective punishment on the civilian population of Gaza, and that continues to deny to Palestinians their human rights and national aspirations."', as fact when they are only opinion. Thanks for tagging it. I am sure it will be resolved soon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jason.Schwartz (talk • contribs) 01:52, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Defense of Ein Rafa

Greetings Sfrantzman! Thanks for defending Ein Rafa's existence on Wikipedia. That could've potentially caused a chain-reaction which would involve village articles I created in the past, particularly Sheikh Danun and Kammaneh. Oh, and thanks for expanding the article's content as well. Cheers! --Al Ameer son (talk) 03:59, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm afraid I do not know much about these villages, especially the Bedouin ones in the Galilee. Lately I've been concentrating on Arab towns and villages in the West Bank and the history of Nablus' and Bethlehem's families as well as the al-Husayni clan of Jerusalem. I'm not a researcher (just a junior in high school), however, I have a great interest in these subjects. Most of my knowledge comes from online resources. The source I used for Kammaneh awhile back was [2]. As for my family history, all I know is that my great paternal grandfather migrated with his two brothers and their families from the Mandeb neighborhood in Aleppo to Majd al-Krum. My father's family is still quite small (about 250 members at most). My mother's family came from Gaza to Kafr Yasif over 100 years, but her family is gigantic, probably the largest or second largest Muslim family in the religiously mixed town of Kafr Yasif. --Al Ameer son (talk) 20:25, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

DYK

Hi. I've nominated Mennonites in Mexico, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on June 21, where you can improve it if you see fit. --​​​​D​​tbohrer​​​​^{talk•contribs} 03:55, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

On 26 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mennonitism in Mexico, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Daniel Case (talk) 03:33, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

ThanksSeth J. Frantzman (talk) 14:38, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Srebrenica Genocide Denial

Dear Seth J. Frantzman, I read your reviews on amazon and I was shocked to hear that you are Srebrenica genocide denier. Professor Barry Lituchy, who wrote books on Jasenovac, is a Serbian propagandists who denied genocide of Bosniaks (Bosnian Muslims) in Jasenovac concentration camp. You may read about him here. Have you properly researched the involvement of Serbian Chetniks in extermination of Jews in Yugoslavia? Serbs portray themselves as the major Balkan victims of the Second World War, but conceal the Chetnik collaboration with Nazi fascists, including systematic genocide that they had committed against several peoples, including the Bosniaks and Jews. I have spoken about it on my [blog here. You can regain your credibility only if you stop denying genocide. Bosniak (talk) 00:20, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Response to Seth

Dear Seth, what happened to Jews was worse than genocide, and many people don't realize this fact. There is a difference between genocide and holocaust. Holocaust is a combination of genocides which resulted in 6 million Jews murdered by Nazi fascists. Holocaust is worse than genocide. Having said that, genocide is not about numbers. Please read my reasoning here http://srebrenica-genocide.blogspot.com/2008/08/can-genocide-be-committed-by-letting.html I am very thankful to you for responding to my message. Bosniak (talk) 04:22, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Shehita

The first link that you put in on the discussion page as it stands at present to article Shehita does not work. Regards RPSM (talk) 21:51, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Shehita

The first link on the discussion page to article Shehita as it stands at present (author:you) does not work. [[3]] Regards RPSM (talk) 21:52, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Modest proposal

I am inviting partners to develop messages reflecting the decency of people like Ferenc Deak, John Rawls, and perhaps Plekhanov....

Your articles in the Jerusalem Post and in your blog are a solid starting line... —Preceding unsigned comment added by S4200 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

i wonder

can you spell narcissism? rmakleff@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.132.86.95 (talk) 10:39, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

LOL

http://opiniojuris.org/2009/09/22/the-worst-anti-icc-editorial-ever/

Response: I thought this was funny too, I am proud. I guess the article must have angered the International Law religion beleivers and thus rather than being the "worst", it must in fact have had much to say in its critique. Seth J. Frantzman (talk) 13:31, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

That is incredibly faulty reasoning, simply because something provokes a reaction does not mean that it had anything to say. I might get annoyed with someone , erroneously, trying to convince me that a rock is in fact a living organism. I might get annoyed at their stupidity. Therefore their critique of the current perception of rocks as inanimate objects must have something to it and rocks probably are living organisms...... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.135.68 (talk) 10:27, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

amazon review of annihilating difference

I was unable to post the following because im a uk amazon user but i read your review and would like to take issue with some of your analysis:

Firstly let me just say I think it is a very good book, in particular the chapter on Rwanda by Taylor. However, I think one must remember that the book is a series of anthropological studies and as such an attempt to try and get at the heart of what motivates genocide by approaching it from different instances. I think it does this very well, of course Genocide isn't war and the writer doesn't claim that it is entirely, social phenomena are incredibly difficult to distinguish and often have common roots - particularly when it comes down to violence- maybe you should re-read that chapter. Also any suggestion that what occurred in Bosnia was not genocide shows a blatant ignorance of the meaning of the word - Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group. Simply because an example of Genocide doesn't appear in this book doesn't mean the book is bad or ill-informed, maybe it's not just relevant or there isn't enough information to make it useful to the overall considerations of the book.

My thoughts exactly

Another editor who disagreed with notability actually did some clean up that was pretty cool. Much of the coverage addressing notability was controversial so it did look like it could turn into an attack piece down the road. It is easy enough to modify and bring back if you pop up more in reliable sources. You hopefully have a log career in front of you so maybe in th future. I actually wasn't the person who started it, but I assume he will be keeping an eye out. He is a decent guy from the editing I have done with him so would expect it to not be a negative article -- none on Wikipedia are supposed to be negative of course. Cptnono (talk) 20:56, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Re: Seth Frantzman

Hi Seth, I'm glad to hear that you were opposed to having the article on yourself as well. And congratulations on being a columnist! That whole issue was pretty confusing, because your blog has the same name as your column I take it? It was a bit hard to figure out because there hasn't been much written about you (as opposed to by you). Regardless, as I told Cptnono, I think you're on track to become a quite notable (by Wikipedia standards) person one day, at which point you'll probably have an article about you again. I'm hopefully that future editors will be able to keep the malicious material out when that happens. Cheers. ← George ^talk 21:47, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Edwin Black seeks contact asap. Pls email me inquiry@dwinblack.com

Edwin Black seeks contact asap. Pls email me inquiry@edwinblack.com

File copyright problem with File:Ruth Kark mon.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Ruth Kark mon.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:01, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Cleanup

Hello, Sfrantzman. You are invited to join WikiProject Cleanup, a WikiProject and resource for Wikipedia cleanup listings, information and discussion. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:51, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Category:Daher al-Omar fortifications

Category:Daher al-Omar fortifications, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:12, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hebraic Political Studies

The article Hebraic Political Studies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Journal that appeared only for a short period. No independent sources, not indexed in any selective database. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 18:16, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Gadsar nahal.JPG

The file File:Gadsar nahal.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Crusader sites

Template:Crusader sites has been nominated for merging with Template:Crusader states. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 13:31, 13 August 2019 (UTC)