User talk:Tomheaton
Welcome to Wikipedia - since you've been here for 10 days, you probably know Wikipedia:New user log, Wikipedia:Sandbox, Wikipedia:Help and Wikipedia:FAQ. So I hope you'll stay and have fun.--Fenice 15:19, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)
You put a vfd-tag on Asplode a few days ago. If you do that, you have to also list the entry on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion, and state your reasons for wanting to have it deleted.--Fenice 15:19, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Wasn't nearly clever enough[edit]
You can always revert to the vandalized version of your user page, but I think I'd wait for something more clever than the "you are teh gay!" school of vandal prose. ;-) Terrapin 14:31, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Are you sure it's not a useful link? The term is used like that pretty commonly, it probably wouldn't hurt to have a stub on it. — Kate Turner | Talk 09:01, 2004 Oct 22 (UTC)
- Hmm. Yes, I prefer that actually... so I've gone and done it :-) — Kate Turner | Talk 21:06, 2004 Oct 23 (UTC)
I assume your point is that information about WASTE (the software) is trivial compared to the bulk of the general info of the site. (Not unimportant, but trivial in context.) If so, I can see where you're coming from. I don't necessarily agree, but I won't put the reference back in either. I did like the edit you made on the "Lot 49" paragraph. Much more concise than what I had written! --proteus71 20:35 GMT 04 Nov 2004
AfD nomination of Army Men (series)[edit]
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Army Men (series). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Army Men (series). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)