Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rapid Deployment Forces

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 02:32, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)

Rapid Deployment Forces[edit]

This is a duplicate of Rapid Deployment Force, which according to both articles, is the official name of the organization. - Amerika 07:42, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NO DELETE Rapid Deployment Forces(plural) is the correct name. As creator, I inadvertently made a Rapid Deployment Force (singular) which is the duplicate that can be delelted. This pag, Rapid Deployment Forces is the correct and current version which needs to be saved. Thank you. Nobs 18:21, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The plural form appears to be the correct one. The Congressional Budget Office uses the plural form ([1]). Recommend withdrawal of nomination, redirect of Rapid Deployment Force to Rapid Deployment Forces, and correction of article to use correct name. I will implement the second and third ones. -- Jonel 19:01, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Sounds good to me. Thank you. Nobs 19:37, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. as per Nobs. Military units are notable in my book.Capitalistroadster 02:25, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
keep no duplication since there is a redirect. Mozzerati

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.