Talk:Norman Morrison

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment[edit]

Should we change the external links? Even though the material on Norman Morrison is good, some of the other material on the same pages does not have a neutral POV.

Stamp[edit]

Is there a reference for this statement: "a postage stamp, possession of which was prohibited in the US"? I googled around and couldn't find anything.

Norman was honoured all over the world for his sacrifice, but especially in North Vietnam where the government issued a postage stamp in his honour. This stamp was considered a danger to American citizens, especially children, so it was declared contraband. It was against the law to import or posses this postage stamp while on American soil. Upon the establishment of diplomatic relations wiith Vietnam this ban was removed - http://www.davidsettinoscott.com/walk-05.htm
That's the only reference I can find, I agree it sounds odd, but don't fully support removing the line either since there is a reference to it, however debateable. I may eMail the webmaster of that site and ask if he has any references however. Sherurcij 19:54, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
Interesting. It might be a good idea to add this to the Censorship_in_the_United_States article.--Timtak 23:53, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I'm a librarian with access to a large set of expensive online databases including the full text of the New York Times going back to 1851. I couldn't find reference to the prohibition of the Vietnamese Norman Morrison stamp anywhere. I looked in several other databases and also did some Google searching. I also am hesitant to remove the line, since it may eventually lead to someone verifying this as absolutely false or absolutely true. I don't think its true but would love to know for sure.
As an amateur philatelist, I know that US citizens are not permitted to have stamps, no matter the subject, from certain countries that are under US embargo (Cuba and N. Korea come to mind, but N. Vietnam would not surprise me at all - I'm pretty sure that Soviet stamps are allowed). This is why US-based catalogues, such as the Scott catalogue don't have list prices, or lists of stamps for these countries. So, it isn't the subject matter that's verboten, it's the country of issue. (BTW, as a Canadian, I'm not subject to the same restraints, and I have a few N. Korean, Cuban (and possibly N. Vietnamese, I'd have to check) in my collection. Don't know what I'd do if I had to move down south ... ) --Canuckguy 02:57, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External Link[edit]

The first external link [[1]] has a POV conclusion.

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:09, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Normanmorrison.jpg[edit]

Image:Normanmorrison.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have not seen these pix, and do not know what they show, but it seems that adding a photo of him on fire, at the very least, would make for a far more compelling article (see the article about Thích Quảng Đức, the picture of whom was a "photo of the year"). A portrait-style picture would also be helpful. It's hard to believe that there are none out there... --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 17:53, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:MorrisonTribute.jpg[edit]

Image:MorrisonTribute.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:20, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

wording[edit]

OK so was it kerosene as stated in your article or gasoline as also stated in your article. Please make up your mind. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.1.188.84 (talk) 03:43, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Poem: "Ê-mi-ly, con"[edit]

For interest, a translation of the poem by Tố Hữu is here: http://taybui.blogspot.com/2010/09/e-mi-ly-con-emily-child-to-huu-1965.html - but note that as a personal blog this is not a suitable source for a ref on the main page. Snori (talk) 06:39, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Play[edit]

Dunno about notability; it'd be nice to see a source other than the (apparent) author. Anmccaff (talk) 18:07, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]