Talk:Angel Sanctuary

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled comments[edit]

I see that "God" and "god" are used interchangeably. Should there be a standardization on "God"?

WpZurp 02:33, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Probably.

Depends on how it's being used. Aya_Frost 1:15, 20 Aug 2006

BTW Moonlil is Ruri's soul it was metioned by Sara twice in the later volumns of the serious probaly 12 or 13 but she definantly says it so yeah thought that that was majorly important because if it's not in here well then that might not be good hahaha.

Moon Lily is NOT Ruri. Moon Lily is a Grigori that was given human form to be a sister, she was never a human. In Viz's English translation she is innaccurately referred to as "Riru" (NOT "Ruri") which sounds like a mistranslation of "lily." ~~Sandoz


Seinen?
It is said in the article, that the manga is a seinen-manga. But it was released in a shojo-magazine? NekoMusume (talk) 15:35, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Broken link[edit]

The official homepage link appears to be broken so I'm taking it off the article page.

I'm just checking... do other Wikipedians approve of removing bad links from pages, or are there different methods, e.g writing a message next to the link saying "link broken" or using the strtikethrough tag? Cheers, --rjcuk (talk) 21:57, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, removing it was the right thing to do. Kaguya-chan (talk) 22:05, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If the link is in a reference, you can alternatively add {{dead link}} after the reference - this alerts regular editors to the article that an alternate source or an archive of the webpage may need to be found. 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 16:34, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews[edit]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Angel Sanctuary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:27, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Angel Sanctuary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:49, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Angel Sanctuary/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Morgan695 (talk · contribs) 02:00, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll be taking this up. Full comments to follow. Morgan695 (talk) 02:00, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Basic GA criteria[edit]

  1. Well written: the prose is clear and concise.
  2. Well written: the spelling and grammar are correct.
  3. Complies with the MOS guidelines for lead sections.
  4. Complies with the MOS guidelines for article structure and layout.
  5. Complies with the MOS guidelines for words to watch.
  6. Complies with the MOS guidelines for writing about fiction
  7. Complies with the MOS guidelines for list incorporation – not applicable.
  8. Complies with the MOS guidelines for use of quotations – not applicable.
  9. All statements are verifiable with inline citations provided.
  10. All inline citations are from reliable sources, etc.
  11. Contains a list of all references in accordance with the layout style guideline.
  12. No original research.
  13. No copyright violations or plagiarism.
  14. Broad in its coverage but within scope and in summary style.
  15. Neutral.
  16. Stable.
  17. Illustrated, if possible.
  18. Images are at least fair use and do not breach copyright.
  • Earwigs pinged copyvio because a Goodreads review copy+pasted the plot summary wholesale, but the article copy precedes the review, so no worries there.
  • inspired by the book Nocturne needs context for what Nocturne is
  • To search for Sara's soul, sent to Hell for incest, Setsuna's body enters a near-death state, and his soul searches for hers, eventually learning that it has been taken to Heaven instead break into two sentences
  • In the second paragraph under "Audio drama", the continued use of "appeared" seems like a strange word choice

Overall, this is a very well written article that requires only a few changes. The over-reliance on primary sources is somewhat concerning, but acceptable by GA standards. Once you've made the changes above, I'll pass the article. Morgan695 (talk) 21:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also think the article and its subpages would benefit from a navbox, but because I didn't mention it in my initial review I decided to be bold and add it myself. Morgan695 (talk) 16:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi and thank you for taking the time to review! It's so very appreciated. Re: the Goodreads review, that is so very embarrassing! I hope it wasn't a big thing. I have made the changes, with the exception of the context for Nocturne, which I don't have, regrettably. The interview only discusses the book title and a brief plot summary, so that's all the context I have. Thank you for adding the navbox; I was not aware of it! Best wishes, Rapunzel-bellflower (talk) 19:56, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Rapunzel-bellflower: For Nocturne I think it literally just needs 2-4 words of context, like the Japanese fantasy novel Nocturne (if it is indeed Japanese and a fantasy novel, just using this as an example) or the novel Nocturne by [author], or something similar. Morgan695 (talk) 20:05, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Of course! I've added it now. Rapunzel-bellflower (talk) 20:14, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Passed for GA. Morgan695 (talk) 20:22, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Angel_Sanctuary&oldid=1211679615"