Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Babiarz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Chris Babiarz was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete

Chris Babiarz[edit]

Article fails to establish notability, probably vanity. Martg76 04:12, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

  • delete, new user's obligatory vanity entry. I'm contemplating VfDing the same user's dyadic communication. The jury is still out. --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway|Talk]] 04:24, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Comment: The dyad is a unit of rhetoric discussed by Kenneth Burke. I read Burke 17 years ago and haven't looked at his works again. Burke is kind of a wild man of rhetorical theory, but some Canadian theorists, in particular, picked up his work and attempted a full rhetoric derived from Burke's ideas (as, for example, people have begun teaching freshman rhetoric using the Aristotelian enthymeme). A substub as bad as this has nothing to justify itself. Burke fans are somewhat rare, but it's not a nonsensical topic. Geogre 15:16, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • delete, vanity. And I'd probably vote to delete dyadic communication, too. Remes 05:12, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete it. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 05:59, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: DCEdwards1966 06:41, Dec 2, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Vain undergrad. --MarkSweep 06:52, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete. --Gtabary 10:04, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: Not a speedy under current rules. (Hmm, dyads are Kenneth Burke's theory, aren't they?) Geogre 15:11, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 19:30, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. --MPerel 09:25, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. COGDEN 18:37, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete [[User:Squash|Squash (Talk)]] 01:07, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.