User talk:Akerkhof

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Francs2000 | Talk [[]] 00:57, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Coinspinner VfD[edit]

I was planning to cast a keep vote, but it seems you've already handled matters by merging the articles. Well done, and a well-written article, too. Shimeru 21:21, Feb 2, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks! Appreciate the support! Akerkhof 22:31, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm actually pretty new, too; so don't take my blowhard style too seriously. What I wrote on the VfD comment is just what I've learned and observed from a few months of intense participation, and certainly reflects my opinions about how Wikipedia and its articles should be structured more than some kind of official policy. You are surely entitled to disagree. Cheers --BM 18:33, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Good Work[edit]

I appreciate your work on creating the articles about the Books of Swords and Twelve Swords of Power. I'm a Saberhagen fan myself, and enjoy seeing his books better represented on Wikipedia.

Thanks. Mr. Billion 06:31, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Twelve Swords of Power[edit]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Twelve Swords of Power, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Addhoc 13:26, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DRV[edit]

I have initiated a deletion review of an AFD which you were involved in. You may wish to contribute to the discussion. Balancer 04:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Twelve Swords of Power for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Twelve Swords of Power is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twelve Swords of Power until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ciridae (talk) 09:37, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Books of Swords for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Books of Swords is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Books of Swords until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RL0919 (talk) 00:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]