User talk:FreplySpang/Archive/JulyAugust2005

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Previous content archived at User talk:FreplySpang/Archive/March2005, User talk:FreplySpang/Archive/April2005, User talk:FreplySpang/Archive/May2005

Comments from User:txgeekgirl regarding God's Learning Channel listing on Wikipedia[edit]

This listing has had a (vfd) for Vanity or Ad type status and placed on comment for delete by you. I am the webmaster for this television station, and have today modified the listing to be in line with similar listings for Christian TV such as Day Star and TBN. Just to note, what was listed before I made the changes today was NOT what was submitted by our chief engineer. Thank you. (UTC)


Reverted edits by 68.170.207.34 to last version by Robeykr[edit]

Thank-you. Jason Palpatine 06:14, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Point taken[edit]

From the guideline page Assume good faith:

  • [R]emember to be patient with newcomers, who will be unfamiliar with Wikipedia's culture and rules . . . many newcomers bring with them experience or expertise for which they expect immediate respect. Behaviours arising from these perspectives are not necessarily malicious.

My schooling was . . . eccentric. I came to regard a lack of grammatical and lexical knowledge as others might regard nails on a chalkboard. (My manifesto is Lynne Truss's Eats, Shoots and Leaves, an excellent and erudite work that has been mysteriously classified as humor.)

Just as I smelled triumph through a loophole of sorts, I read from the same page:

  • Correct, but don't scold.

Point taken.

As you may have gathered from my User page, I am very green here (here on the planet, I mean; I’m 16) and more than a bit sarcastic (treating comics as religious icons).

I think I cut myself on Hanlon’s Razor.

Thanks[edit]

Muchas gracias por haber defendido mi página de usuario, SqueakBox July 3, 2005 17:50 (UTC)

G.I. Joe: An Austro-Hungarian Hero

Sorry[edit]

Please move the templates Template:Dbraceyrulestalkpage, Template:Dbraceyrulestemplate and Template:Dbraceyrulestemplate2 into your user space. Templates that are only for your personal use do not belong in the general Template area. For instance, you could move Template:Dbraceyrulestemplate2 to User:Dbraceyrules/template2 and then use it by putting {{User:Dbraceyrules/template2}} on your user page. For detailed information on how to move a page, see m:Help:Moving a page. I have asked you to do this before. If you do not move these templates within 3 days, I will nominate them on Wikipedia:Templates for deletion. FreplySpang (talk) 23:34, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry, I must have missed your first warning. I edited as you asked. I didn't know that I needed a personal user space. SorryHoratii 23:53, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Another thing, I used a different title and that why the one you had prescribed has a different link. Horatii 23:57, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for taking care of this! FreplySpang (talk) 23:59, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Esta bien, gracias. Sorry again for not doing it the first time...I just saw where you had warned me that time.

Jinx[edit]

I'll let you list it and take the glory, I'm off to bed in a minute... -- Francs2000 | Talk 23:39, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Blanking[edit]

I'm sorry. I'll stop.--24.219.188.230 23:56, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. It feels good to know there are people out there trying to make Wikipedia a nice place to be. – Quadell (talk) (sleuth) 20:24, July 14, 2005 (UTC)


I removed this section, because they were in two places. Maybe, I was wrong. 212.76.39.228 20:40, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

---

Umm hey. Yeah I think I posted it on the wrong page. Sorry! --Steven P.S. It got deleted anyhow. Also I'm unexperienced with wikipedia so I hope you understnad my mistake. P.P.S. The articles you have created are interesting.

It's true. Rita Fan -- like most Americans and Mainland Chinese -- gets wet between her legs at the sight of people who believe in liberty, equality, and democracy being slaughtered.

My appreciation[edit]

Thanks for your help in reverting the vandal hitting my user page. An oddity: The IP that was spuriously adding my name to various articles had been used, only two hours earlier, to create a stub about Jimmy "Jax" Pinchak. I thought it might be a hoax but it's a real child actor. He's appearing in a TV series that was mentioned in the stub but with a red link, so I did a little research and wrote Over There (series). So the siege of vandalism resulted in a small expansion of our coverage. Strange are the ways of the wiki. JamesMLane 22:09, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

The mop is mine!

Thanks for voting in my RfA; I promise I'll wield my sacred mop with care. If you ever need me for anything, you know where to find me. Thanks again! -- Essjay · Talk 15:19, July 20, 2005 (UTC)

Yo it be da bombe![edit]

Thanks for the Infernokrush. Normally, those "updating to Ebonics" style things are derisive, but that one actually manages to keep the meaning of the scene rather well. Quite surprisingly good. Reminds me of my days in Carrboro, NC, when I had thoughts of writing a Midsummer's Night Dream set among street gangs, with Obi Wan (for Oberon) and Titania (for Titania...I didn't rethink everything) and a Theater In the Park for the theater in the park. Later, I saw what a hackneyed idea it was. Everyone has done it. Anyway, it's a good non-sonnet piece, alright. Geogre 19:31, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carrboro-NC-4-1-00.jpg
Dorothy, the Lion, and I ran across a field of poppies, and thought we dreamed a place that was like a pat of butter in a frying pan of grease.

Delete[edit]

Hi Freply. What happened to your delete button? Special:Undelete/Anthony Connor Cheers, [[smoddy]] 21:35, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ah right. Well, if you look at the deletion history, it's already been deleted four times now... Cheers, [[smoddy]] 21:39, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from 71.102.181.89[edit]

Come on... my "eat my ass" entry was funny. You could've left it up for a while. People would have enjoyed it.

Remember, "Don't feed the troll". =) -- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 06:42, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry, I'm out of Purina Troll Chow tonight. :-) FreplySpang (talk) 06:43, July 23, 2005 (UTC)


Bobbybuilder and Erectile Dysfunction[edit]

I just thought it was funny.--JennyJohansen 22:53, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry[edit]

It is the first time that I have contributed to the Wikipedia and I was not trying to make links to commercial sites or promote a site, I am just trying to add information that I thought was relevant and was still in the process of editing it. from neonexis

AFF content changes[edit]

Hi, I wanted to let you know of the discussion I've been having with this editor (tregoweth) as well. I'm going to follow these suggestions for adding AFF links to important articles on Wikipedia. Please let me know you are in agreement with him before I make the changes only to have them deleted again. Thanks for your help in adding content to Wikipedia!

"In reply to your comment on my user page, it's still advertising, even if the organization is worthy and nonprofit. Dropping plugs into articles is not the way to go about it.

If there is an article about a particular film, then a link to AFF would probably be OK. But adding a blurb about a movie to an article about someone interviewed in the movie is a bit much. tregoweth 15:22, July 26, 2005 (UTC)

The general thing to remember is Wikipedia is not a soapbox. One problem is that some of the text you inserted seemed to come direct from marketing materials, which is jarring in an encyclopedia article. In the Lillian Gish article, for example, you added:

The Emmy-award winning documentary Lillian Gish: An Actor's Life for Me by Terry Sanders of American Film Foundation is a personal and candid celebration of the actress' life.

I would suggest something more neutral, like: Gish's life is documented in [Terry Sanders]' 1999 documentary [Lillian Gish: An Actor's Life for Me].

And, in external links,

In some of the articles, mentioning that they appeared in such-and-such documentary seems odd, especially if the article is very short and they are just an interviewee, not the subject. Obviously, Maya Lin's documentary should be in the article,, since it won an Oscar; the Gish and Neil Simon documentaries probably deserve mention also. But something like Into the Future isn't a big part of Tim Berners-Lee's career, so it probably shouldn't be in the article. It may be worth mentioning in Robert MacNeil's article among his other works, but just as a straight factual item ("narrator and interviewee, Into the Future (2000 documentary)").

Also, I apologize if I've come across as harsh or otherwise negative.; Any time I see someone add a lot of links to one site, the "spammer!" alarms go off in my head, but I now see that you meant well. Feel free to ask me for any more help; I'm just a regular user, but I think I know my way around here. :) tregoweth 02:08, July 27, 2005 (UTC) "

Credit where credit's due[edit]

For your exceptional rollback persistency, I, smoddy, award you this Barnstar of Reversion. 17:59, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You keep beating me on rollback! As penance, you are obliged to display this barnstar prominently. Cheers, and congratulations! [[smoddy]] 17:59, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Why, thank you very much! And, apparently, we are both recipients of the "RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar". Doesn't that give you a warm glow inside? Cheers, [[smoddy]] 18:20, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Zuig mijn ballen 18:44, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry[edit]

Sorry, I added comments to the wrong page. Dbraceyrules 19:17, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User page[edit]

Hey, I see you fixed the problem with the image on your user page. It looks much better now; the picture doesn't cover up half the text. Jarlaxle 18:02, July 29, 2005 (UTC)

Hrmm… Never mind. On my browser (MSN), sometimes the large flower image covers up half of the text on the left side, but other times when the page loads anew, it doesn't. Jarlaxle 18:07, July 29, 2005 (UTC)

clitoris[edit]

"There's no consensus for keeping the image. Yes, the virgin loser geeks love the titilation it brings, but let's try and curb the glasses + chortle factor."

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism of my user page. Actually, this whole group of IP 212.138.47.* have been into this type of behavior, my user page was vandalized several times by one of them, until the IP was blocked by User:Mel Etitis yesterday. The vandal then created an account and vandalized my page again, which Mel blocked. So, today, the vandal resorted to making an account yet again just to vandalize my page. The main grudge the vandal bears against me is quite surprising, at least to me. If you look into the page history of Rohingya, you can see that the article was initially a copyvio from a website. I organized the article into sections and edited the copyvio sections, added "External links" section (which was previously named as "Free Rohingya campaign web directory" or something like that. I also pointed that out in the talk page (Talk:Rohingya). For some surprising reason, the IP block 212.138.47.* were quite angry with the organization and left obscene comments on the talk page. Recently, they went on asking people how to delete user pages (See User talk:Malathion and User talk:Ragib). After that, they started leaving {{vfd}} and {{speedy}} tags in the talk page of one of the persons I corresponded about this (see User talk:Kunyia) and in my user page. I realize that the IP block is a dynamic IP range, and there are good edits from that range, but all of the vandals participating in the above vandalisms are from 212.138.47.* . My only hope is that they'd get tired of it and stop.

Anyway, thanks for keeping an eye on the vandals ... I appreciate the revert of vandalism in my page. --Ragib 05:56, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Protection of your user page[edit]

Sorry, I have to protect your user page from vandalism because it's rather annoying to see your page pop up 30 times in the Related changes (When I check the Wikipedia:Wikifun related changes) because of some person who insists on vandalizing your page. --AllyUnion (talk) 08:14, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to disturb you, but I see you participated on the reverts for Costco. The user that was reverted has dropped me some notes in my talk which perhaps you'd like to read and comment on. I do this since the note it's not clear and in some reading it could be seen as he may be threatening with legal actions for my revert (¿?) and I'd like to hear further comments on the matter. drini 17:26, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Admin needed[edit]

Since you seem to be online would you block User:Stmethodist and delete his image uploads? I'm not an admin so I uploaded a single pixel to replace them but they are offensive images used to vandalise Methodism thanks! Pedant 07:18, 2005 August 1 (UTC)


As pointed out by Micheal J. Behe and MENSA, et al, "evolution is Darwinism and Darwinism is evolution". A load of crap foisted on an unknowing public who do not understand molecular biology. The Story of Evolution is a fraud on the most basic level.--Numerousfalx 18:29, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your Vandalism[edit]

As the Cult of Scientology is officially recognized as a Cult in a majority of nations, please do not vandalize the article by falsely moving it again.

Freply[edit]

Go mind your own business! Go do your hobby. Quadell 20:30, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That, obviously, wasn't me. – Quadell (talk) (sleuth) 20:31, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

Another twin[edit]

You asked if a certain user was another clone of me. Yes. I have literally dozens. Lucky me. – Quadell (talk) (sleuth) 20:31, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

Dropping off a note[edit]

Just saying thanks for removing the vandalism on my page. Redwolf24 00:08, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for de-vandalising my user page. It's been got twice now today, different IP, but I suspect the same person. I've warned two different IP's after vandalism to Grunge music which seems to be attracting them today. --Doc (?) 23:40, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support[edit]

Thank you for supporting my recent RfA. I was surprised and humbled by the number of positives votes. I'll be monitoring RfA regularly from now on and will look for a chance to "pay it forward". Cheers, --MarkSweep 02:32, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sandy Lam[edit]

I have tried to rewrite the article so it is no longer a walking copy right violation. Only someone keeps removing it, which is fair enough, but also replaces it with mildly unpleasant abuse of Ms Lam. Would you mind having a look at what has been done and offering any advice or guidance you can think of? Thanks. Lao Wai 15:31, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking[edit]

I am being targeted by two overzealous editors who revert everything I post regardless of the merits of my comments simply because they do not share my perspective. I blanked the DOH page to get some attention from somebody higher up. Thanks for noticing; now you can likewise warn SaltyPig and FCYTravis.

WillC

Vandalism[edit]

Thanks for removing the penises from my user page. -- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 20:56, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I was scanning through the IP blocklist, and cracked up over one of your reasons for blocking a user: template penisification. Thanks for the laugh. (I was going to create a new section, but this seemed to fit here nicely.) Joyous (talk) 21:22, August 7, 2005 (UTC)

Sorry about this, I don't know how else to talk to you.

Alright, here's the deal on my musicianforums.com stuff.

Over at musicianforums.com, we made an mx dictionary with all of the popular terms and such and explaining their meanings and origins. I was then asked by a mod to index all of the definitions on wikipedia. I have also been putting the "Courtesy of musicianforums.com" in, so that the users of mx will see that the definition refers to that forum, and not to something else, to prevent confusion. Don't worry this isn't spam, and it even has the potential to increase wikipedia's traffic by up to 80,000 users!

So, in conclusion, there are no copyright issues, as not only do I have permission to post these definitions, but I was asked to. Not only that, but I'm bringing in site views, traffic, definitions, and even new users for you, wikipedia.

Anyways, sorry for any confusion, and I'm going to continue posting definitions. Also, if you explain to me how to use user talk, I will utilize it next time around.

Thanks, -Adam


So you may not need more traffic. As for unhelpful and unencyclopedic, they are helping up to 80,000 people use wiki for popular internet definitions, and a large portion of these definitions apply to other internet forums aswell. Unenecyclopedic? I think for the most part, they are encyclopedic, with a few exceptions. Feel free to delete the exceptions, but I really don't think that all of my definitions should be removed, as some of them actually are helpful and have not been indexed yet.

Thanks Again, -Adam

Hello![edit]

Just noticed you comment on the Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Gabrielsimon/Evidence page, and thought I'd make a quick introduction, mostly based on your location in Boston. I am such a fan of Boston, the city and its various sport teams that I named my dog Boston! I have made several trips there and always enjoy the ambiance and history of the place. I had an especially interesting experience (to me at least) when I was walking through the Old North section of town and accidentally found myself on the "Coops Hill Burying Ground"(?) Resting place of the (in)famous Mathers and John Paul Jones, as well as numerous other notable people. In fact, just writing this makes me want to do a bit of research and add it to the Boston article. Regardless just a short note indicating my appreciation and good wishes for you and all the other dedicated editors and admins here. Good luck to all of us! See you round the wiki! Hamster Sandwich 22:54, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • Well my suspisions turned out to be correct re: Gavin the Sockpuppet.User talk:Gavin the Chosen I'm not surprised, but I suspect you aren't either. BTW thanks for your reply to my memo. I wish you luck in your classes. Of course when I was wandering around Cambridge I had to look around the Harvard campus. Heck I've seen Love Story and The Paper Chase multiple times! :-D See you 'round, nice lady! Hamster Sandwich 05:59, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • I've been keeping track of the vandalism going on here, and for the record I think you must be doing the right thing or you wouldn't be getting so much of it. Keep up the good work! Hamster Sandwich 01:54, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Kellett[edit]

The anonymous IP who created the article has shown very bad faith (as evidenced on 62.252.224.15's user talk page). I'm unfortunately busy, but could you get the IP blocked? I added a VfD notice to Laura Kellett, and it was removed before I could even finish adding it to WP:VfD. jglc | t | c 19:45, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Is she or is she not freakish, sir? Is she or is she not as tall as she is wide? Does she or does she not slobbr all over the place like Daffy Duck, sir? These are factual statements! It is you who is adding nonsense by censoring the truth, sir! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.83.136.23 (talkcontribs) 21:08, 9 August 2005

Thanks for your support[edit]

The mop is mine!

Thank you for voting to support my RFA. I've been promoted, and I promise to wield the mop with good faith, patience, and fairness... except when I'm exterminating vandals with the M-16 recoilless nuclear Gatling mop. --malathion talk 08:09, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Beelzebub (your revert)[edit]

Hi, why did you remove the image I appended to that article? --200.80.39.186

Hmm, I understand, I should change my IP address. --200.80.39.186 18:05, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You don't know what you've done.[edit]

I love wikipedia. It's the greatest resource on the web. But when I edited the China article, I didn't do it out of hate. I did to warn the public. Someday you'll look back on this day and realise the mistakes you've made.

Every comment you erased. Every liberty you will lose. Every paragraph you destroyed. Every chinaman that whips you.

Remember this day,

God Bless America,

Ah, but I know what FreplySpang has done: reverted a collection of puerile changes. -- Hoary 14:00, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
"I Know What You Reverted Last Summer"? :-) FreplySpang (talk) 20:44, August 10, 2005 (UTC)

Func's RfA :)[edit]

Hi, FreplySpang! Thank you for supporting my adminship, and for being a cool irc buddy. :)

Please never hesitate to let me know if you have concerns with any administrative action I may make.

Functce,  ) 23:03, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

BaronLarf's RFA[edit]

Thanks for you support on my recent RFA, and for all the help you gave me a couple months ago with the SummerFR problems. Please let me know if I can help with any particular administrative responsibilities, or if you have any problems with the way I use the admin tools. Cheers. --BaronLarf 00:38, August 11, 2005 (UTC)

Copyright question[edit]

  • Could you explain why Cerner's page is in violation? I think it may have been in violation when you first spotted it, but I believe it has been fixed. I no longer see any of the text from the wikipedia page on the site listed to have the copyright problem. Thanks for your help.
I believe my question was already answered here... thanks. --Matt Smith 17:16, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
  • Secondary question: How long before the original page in violation is deleted, and the new temp page replaces the old page? It's been about two weeks so far. Thanks --Matt Smith 18:27, August 19, 2005 (UTC)

revert[edit]

Thank you for reverting my userpage and userdiscussionpage. Regards, John N. 18:07, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Same goes for me. Gzuckier 19:18, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oxygen Network[edit]

I have permisiion to use this material under the terms of this license: Copyright (c) 2005 PRESS DEPARTMENT, OXYGEN MEDIA INC. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License".

Geraldine Laybourne[edit]

I have permisiion to use this material under the terms of this license: Copyright (c) 2005 PRESS DEPARTMENT, OXYGEN MEDIA INC. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License".

userpage vandalism[edit]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. It's amazing that people actually enjoy wasting their time =). --Spangineer (háblame) 23:26, August 11, 2005 (UTC)

My User Page[edit]

Thanks for reverting the edits to my user page, I appreciate it :-) Soltak 18:00, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Gpyoung[edit]

Yeah, I saw thanks. Ive really just started patrolling to New Pages page, so if im not doing something correctly, please let me know, as you seem to be quite involved in vandal fighting yourself --Gpyoung talk 01:37, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re:John Wroe[edit]

I posted some info on John Wroe from the www.cichurch.com page as I am an administrator of that site and have permission to use the info -

this it is not a breach of copyright??

how can I rectify the situation -- ?

Well, I asked her to verify that she's releasing it to GFDL, and it says on the edit page that you're releasing it to the GFDL, and she says on the Talk page that she's copyright holder, I guess that should be enough. Zoe 06:03, August 20, 2005 (UTC)

Hello[edit]

Hello, FreplySpang. Thanks for blocking User:Jorlyn. I blocked him right after you also for 24 hrs. Just curious- do you know what happens if two admins block the same user? What if they are different lengths? (I know I've seen this question asked before, but can't remember...) Thanks! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 23:50, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 23:55, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

awww![edit]

I was going to revert the vandal! you beat me to it! Hamster Sandwich 01:34, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

award[edit]

I, Redwolf24, award you this barnstar as my 5,000th edit for blocking some of my trolls, supporting me, being a friendly and funny user, and being a valuable Wikipedian :)

You deserve it :D Redwolf24 04:30, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

:-) Thanks! FreplySpang (talk) 05:06, August 21, 2005 (UTC)

AOL Blocking Problems[edit]

Please be aware that when you autoblock an AOL user, you also block other editors who are randomly assigned the same IP number.

This problem is an ongoing one for me. Please see my user page: User:WBardwin/AOL Block Collection. I would appreciate a prompt removal of this block (see below). Thank you. WBardwin 06:05, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your user name or IP address has been blocked by FreplySpang.

The reason given is this: Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "MRS LOL". The reason given for MRS LOL's block is: "vandalism, was warned". Your IP address is 207.200.116.196.

Thank you for your reply. I appreciate your attention. I believe I am not the only editor who faces this on a regular basis, and so I would encourage your efforts in solving this software problem if you have any interest. Peace. WBardwin 22:59, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting my talk page[edit]

I thank you for it. Cheers :) Kel-nage 11:53, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage revert[edit]

Thanks ;) Fernando Rizo T/C 18:50, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thank you for showing me how Wikipedia works, I have never tried editing any pages, and therefore, I did not know that Wikipedia had any way of keeping track of vandalism. I'm just glad that you got to it before someone else did, because they might not have been so nice about it. Wikipedia is pretty cool, maybe I should create an account.

Celebration![edit]

Champagne is often drunk as part of a celebration

Please join me in celebrating my 1000th edit at Wikipedia, the most important online information resource! Hamster Sandwich 21:46, 21 August 2005 (UTC) Thank you for the toast! Long life to you, brave wiki warrior! Hamster Sandwich 23:16, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just wanted to appologize for the typo on your name when I did the last rv, disadvantage of not having a rollback link. Who?¿? 22:46, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Adamwankenobi[edit]

Thanks for blocking him. I'm getting sick of his vandalism but I've feared the block may be controversial. Yours, Redwolf24 22:53, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't me who "penized" your page or what ever, a clever simoltanious vandal. Look, the guy is a buddy of mine who wont shut up. I'll be more more civil. Adamwankenobi 23:07, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This Quadell/Penis Image Vandal[edit]

Do you know who this is and can he be blocked? It is starting to drive me nuts, I started reverting Quadell's page and then he attacked me! Thanks for all that you've done. -- MicahMN | Talk 23:20, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Determining sockpuppetry[edit]

FS, I've never come to you with anything like this before, but you seem like the approachable type. I've been an admin for 2 days now, and I'm definitely over my head with this one.

User:Agriculture is concerned that User:Hipocrite is a sock puppet created solely to criticize him. I looked around a bit, and it seems like his idea may have merit. The big caveat is that Hipocrite has not, to the best of my knowledge, made any specific attacks against Agriculture nor has he broken any other WP policies outright. He is maintaining user subpages where he is listing every edit made by Agriculture, which Agriculture views as threatening. I have no idea how to proceed from here. Any advice? Fernando Rizo T/C 00:30, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should look at the users edit history, and see if it goes back to substantially before whatver conflict the user was alledged to have been created for. You should also look to see that they have a repeatable editing history - for instance, that they edited an article, say, John Lott through their entire career at the encyclopedia. For a prime example of an obvious not-sockpuppet, you could do a cursory investigation of my edit history. You will find the prospects of me being a sockpuppet are not promising. Hipocrite 01:19, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My user page[edit]

Hi FS, thank you for keeping my user page clean. SlimVirgin (talk) 00:31, August 22, 2005 (UTC)

Birthday[edit]

If I can assume from your most recent edit to your userpage that you just experienced a birthday, we're almost exactly the same age. 21st or 22nd of August? I'm on the 21st. Joyous (talk) 01:57, August 22, 2005 (UTC)

Otherkin[edit]

Thanks for protecting. Could you please add {{protected}}, now? ~~ N (t/c) 17:12, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Blank[edit]

Ya, sorry. It may be an unnintentional mistake. Can you say me how I can upload Multimedia files. Cyborg Apollo 22:47, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Blue footed booby[edit]

Look, maybe my teacher was wrong, but thats what she told me, in all honesty.

Synchronicity again: User:203.10.121.82[edit]

How come only 24 hours though? Was I excessive with a weeklong ban? S/he'd already been banned several times. Fernando Rizo T/C 04:24, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]