User talk:198.200.181.205

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi. Good job spotting and removing that vandalism.

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia and that you choose to become a Wikipedian by creating an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, you should sign your name to your posts and comments with ~~~~.

Cheers, -- Infrogmation 21:22, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)

August 2007[edit]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Come & Go. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Thank you. Spellcast 13:25, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Peru, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Stephenb (Talk) 19:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Peru. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Stephenb (Talk) 19:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Taco, you will be blocked from editing. --ShelfSkewed Talk 19:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Same-sex marriage, you will be blocked from editing. --ShelfSkewed Talk 19:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

  jj137 (talk) 19:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ne-Yo, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. William Avery (talk) 13:24, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

The recent edit you made to Sean Fitzpatrick constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. XF Law talk at me 13:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009[edit]

Your edits to February 21[edit]

Dear 198.200.181.205,
Some of your edits on the page February 21 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

No Wikipedia page has been linked to.

If a Wikipedia page for the person already exists, add a link to it (by putting it in doubled square brackets [[Like this]]) and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 18:38, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page The Real Housewives of Atlanta has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Kingpin13 (talk) 15:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page The Real Housewives of New York City. Such edits constitute defacement and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Kingpin13 (talk) 15:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to The Real Housewives of New York City. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Techman224Talk 15:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you deface a page, as you did with this edit to The Real Housewives of New York City. Kingpin13 (talk) 15:59, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Endocrine gland has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. William Avery (talk) 19:25, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with the page History of American football on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- kainaw 23:04, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Gary Ridgway, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.--Alchemist Jack (talk) 16:48, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Chesapeake Bay has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. CalumH93 (talk) 22:52, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Chesapeake Bay. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Coldplay Expert 22:54, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Chesapeake Bay. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. CalumH93 (talk) 22:57, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Onam, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A8UDI 18:51, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to International rankings of the Philippines, you will be blocked from editing.

April 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Fear has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Orphan Wiki 12:56, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Fear. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  – iridescent 12:59, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010[edit]

Hello, your edit to August Wilson was reverted because it was unconstructive, please use the sandbox for test edits--Lerdthenerd (talk) 13:29, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, your edit to August Wilson was reverted again because it was unconstructive, please don't add nonsense to articles--Lerdthenerd (talk) 13:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page August Wilson has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Orphan Wiki 13:33, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page August Wilson. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Orphan Wiki 13:34, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Stone, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 14:54, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. While everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your contributions, such as your recent edit to Amicable number, did not appear to be constructive and was automatically reverted by DASHBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 14:41, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page WebCT has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 13:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Western School of Technology and Environmental Science. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 13:39, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Palestine Liberation Organization has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. thoriyan 13:43, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bone marrow, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! Thank you. -- jbergste (u) (t) (c) 16:24, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Internet privacy, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jncraton (talk) 18:13, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Web crawler, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. West.andrew.g (talk) 19:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Teammm. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Same-sex marriage in Maryland because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Teammm talk
email
04:23, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to GameFAQs, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Widr (talk) 16:01, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help Request[edit]

I have a content dispute spreading across multiple pro wrestling articles with a user named User:Ribbon Salminen. He has reverted me each time, has failed to respond to my talk page threads or a post on his user talk page, asserted that he is so unconditionally right that he doesn't have to talk to me, and is now identifying my edits as vandalism. I'm a former editor who left wikipedia out of frustration with dealing with the likes of Ribbon Salminen - how can he be forced to discuss the dispute rather than just revert and accuse me of vandalism? See Talk:Cima (wrestler)#Name 198.200.181.205 (talk) 16:14, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have fully protected Cima (wrestler) for 3 days to stop the edit warring, and asked everyone to engage on the article talk page. I noticed that nobody had discussed the issue on the article's talk page, so that should probably be the primary venue for discussion. However, if you think the dispute can't be resolved at the one article, or you'd like assistance working together, please open a thread at the dispute resolution noticeboard.
As an aside, since your IP apparently changes from time to time, I suggest that it may be easier to collaborate with other editors if you register for (and use) a username. Of course, this isn't required, and at all times you should be treated with the same dignity and respect given to registered users. —Darkwind (talk) 18:38, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

...[edit]

Funny that someone who just called me a "self-appointed hall monitor" and "nitwit", is seconds later crying about personal attacks. Get a fucking grip. Your edits are against guidelines and they're automatically identified as vandalism, because they are that. The English stable names are made up by one fan site and are not the correct official names. The Japanese names are used by, among other sites, Dragon Gate (albeit, spelled in hiragana, katakana and kanji). No one halfway decent editor complains about my edits. Just "nitwit" IP editors like you pop up every once in a while and start pissing and moaning about some stupid bullshit when they don't have a leg to stand on.リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (talk) 16:21, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, yeah, I'm sitting here crying my eyes out because someone on the internet (who I have zero respect for) called a hallway monitor. Jesus christ... Notice that I told you days ago to go and start a discussion on your thoughts about the guideline and what other people think about it.リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (talk) 16:36, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Oddbodz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Corporate governance, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Oddbodz (talk) 18:53, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of countries by number of military and paramilitary personnel, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Caution for unsourced inflation of numbers (and don't try to add the "source" you added on Bangladesh Armed Forces, it's a user contributed source, and not WP:RS). Thomas.W talk 15:20, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of countries by level of military equipment. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Warning for unsourced inflation of numbers. Thomas.W talk 15:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of countries by GDP (PPP). Final warning for unsourced inflation of numbers. Thomas.W talk 15:34, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Pine because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 23:04, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pine. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in loss of editing privileges. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 15:36, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Travis Barker, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 17:47, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Donner60. Your recent edit to the page Pine appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 22:03, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Pine has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Dcirovic (talk) 15:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pine. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Dcirovic (talk) 17:25, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Macbeth— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:54, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Gamaliel. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hadiyah-Nicole Green have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Gamaliel (talk) 15:16, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Plantsurfer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Pine have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Plantsurfer 17:39, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Samf4u. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Racial inequality in the United States— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Samf4u (talk) 18:44, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Bruce1ee. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Depression (mood) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. —Bruce1eetalk 17:43, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to David Gibbs (businessman)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:47, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]