Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smart/browse/Personoids

Smart/browse/Personoids was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. 7 votes to delete. Postdlf 03:46, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Smart/browse/Personoids

Incoherant -- I don't think there's any actual content here. --jpgordon{gab} 22:42, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. Incoherent. Even if there is something encyclopedic to say about a coinage by Lem, this would not be the title to write it under and the contents cannot contribute to a useful article. — Gwalla | Talk 23:50, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Nonsense name. Not encyclopedic in its current form. (I even fail to see what it's about.) Delete unless rewritten. - Mike Rosoft 01:00, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • All right. I was giving it too much benefit of doubt. - Mike Rosoft 09:46, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: Unpatented nonsense. Geogre 04:01, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Original research. No potential to become encyclopedic. IMHO probably does fall under "patent nonsense." [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 22:36, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Probably bad enough nonsense to be speedy. Cool Hand Luke (Communicate!) 22:38, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. If it's a neologism, it needs to be treated as such. If it's a serious/usable concept, we need a useful article explaining it. This is neither serious nor usable. Inky 01:33, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.