Talk:Dannii Minogue

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Former good articleDannii Minogue was one of the Music good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
February 11, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
December 21, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
December 30, 2006WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
January 15, 2007Good article nomineeListed
February 11, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 12, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
March 1, 2010Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article
e·h·w·Stock post message.svg To-do:

  • Place article through another peer review.
  • Revert vandalism and inappropriate edits.
  • Remove any and all links to independent fan sites.

Sales and Peaks[edit]

Someone keeps adding bits of incorrect information like this bit I removed:

"the album stormed the charts, reaching the pole position and selling more than 500,000 copies in the first week alone, while its lead single "So Under Pressure", released on June 12, also reached the pole position in the UK charts, with sales in excess of 1 million units. To date, the album has achieved double-diamond status in the UK, which equates to twenty-times platinum, or six million copies. "So Under Pressure" became her first Australian #1 single, and sold more than 250,000 copies in the first week alone. The album repeated this success, also reaching the top of the charts and selling over 2 million copies.

A megamix video will also be serviced to TV outlets world-wide, which will proceed the highly anticipated global release of the hits collection. The megamix video will highlight the many career triumphs from Dannii's vivid past, featuring a selection of tracks from her four smash-hit albums. Remixes of some of Dannii's classic hits will also be released as promotional materials - including a re-worked version of the international dance anthem "Baby Love" which was originally recorded in 1997 as part of the "Girl" project."

Does anyone know who did it? Harry** 23:30, 16 September 2006.

Top 10 Singles[edit]

Someone keeps changing the Top 10 singles to Top 20, Top 75 all the time. THERE IS NO NEED. Just leave it as Top 10 and then don't touch it. It's just stupid to keep changing it. Harry** 13:46, 9 January 2007

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dannii Minogue. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:09, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Opening discussion[edit]

@Almostangelic123: in spite of my unambiguous edit summary and polite offer to discuss, you once again reverted to your preferred version. Normal procedure would be to open a discussion i.e. what I'm doing now is what you should have done. I will restore the article for the time being but will gladly discuss. In short, I feel that the edits you made removed information that improved the article and that overall your edits made the article worse. I would be happy to discuss if you feel differently.NEDOCHAN (talk) 13:49, 25 September 2019 (UTC)