User:VampWillow/rfa

User:VampWillow; (25/0/0) ends 14:30, 1st July 2004 (UTC)

VampWillow has been here since March and has about 1600 contributions. Lots of good new articles and edits, a good understanding of NPOV and wikiquette, and an interest in admin-type tasks (marking for deletion, advising new users on style, etc). -- ALargeElk | Talk 14:27, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Very happy to accept (if you'll all have me, of course;-) --VampWillow 14:58, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Support

1. -- ALargeElk | Talk 14:27, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
2. Ilyanep 14:34, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC) Looks fine to me.
3. David Gerard 14:37, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
4. Finlay McWalter | Talk 14:50, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
5. OwenBlacker 15:05, Jun 24, 2004 (UTC)
6. theresa knott 15:14, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC) (even though it would make her "not normal" ;-))
   1. I did wonder if anyone would remember that ... ;-) VampWillow 15:19, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
7. Support --"DICK" CHENEY 15:21, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
8. Warofdreams 15:38, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
9. Jwrosenzweig 15:51, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
10. john k 16:08, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
11. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 16:17, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
12. Charles Matthews 16:47, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
13. Morwen - Talk 18:46, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
14. Merovingian✍Talk 23:20, Jun 24, 2004 (UTC)
15. James F. (talk) 03:06, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
16. "This is a dumb world. In my world there are people in chains, and we can ride them like ponies." (Support.) jengod 23:10, Jun 25, 2004 (UTC)
17. Lst27 02:46, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
18. MykReeve 03:09, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
19. Fredrik | talk 12:47, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
20. +sj+ 17:25, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC) Mmmm-bop.
21. --GeneralPatton 23:32, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
22. Woggly 08:27, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
23. older≠wiser 23:27, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
24. "Bored now." :D -- Michael Warren 22:42, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
25. ditto. Secretlondon 02:04, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

Charles Matthews 16:47, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC) We met at the London meet-up and - I'll say this: quieter than David Gerard.

At the risk of not being sure if I want to hear the answer, is that a 'good' or a 'bad' thing? :-) --VampWillow 16:55, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Good, definitely good. But the WP soundproofing seems, well, sound. ::Charles Matthews 20:59, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

That's saying very little indeed ... - David Gerard 17:07, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)