Talk:NFL playoffs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleNFL playoffs was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 22, 2007Good article nomineeListed
September 9, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
December 14, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 January 2021 and 14 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Adam.davey.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

playoff format[edit]

The payoffs are set up just right because you don't want to see too many team from the same area always winner. But, I disagree with the number 1 and 2 seeds teams having a bye week. I think they should have numbers 1 and 2 play and the winner plays the lower seeding team from the wild card round, and the loser would hang by a threat by playing the higher seeding team. This way, the number 1 team in each conference would have 2 home playoff games. That's what should happen, this would be fair for all playoff teams to have to play the same number of games to make it to the super bowl.

GA Reassessment[edit]

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:National Football League playoffs/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

This article is reviewed by GA Sweeps. The article remains in good condition and passes the GAR. OhanaUnitedTalk page 16:42, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on NFL playoffs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:07, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Football[edit]

Football 50.110.106.241 (talk) 05:41, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment[edit]

NFL playoffs[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:26, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This 2007 listing contains significant uncited material, along with a host of other issues. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:26, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delist, per my edit summary when placing the GAR request tag on the talk page. This has significant issues with uncited material and cruft. Hog Farm Talk 16:39, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.