Talk:Hanno (crater)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

from VfD:

No potential to become encyclopedic - it's an obscure crater on the Moon. --Jll 20:06, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)

  • Delete. Substub by anon, whose only other contribution has been self-reverted. Hanno does deserve an article, but not this one. Andrewa 21:10, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • I disagree with Jll and agree with Andrewa. Delete unless expanded. _R_ 14:16, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Abstain. Not sure if this kind of topic is notable. Article is certainly poorly written, but I could imagine decent arguments going either way on whether craters on Luna or other solar bodies are worth including. I'm leaning very gently towards keep, but not enough to vote that way (yet). --Improv 17:49, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Weak keep, I did some minor expansion siroχo 19:39, Oct 14, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. It's larger than many U.S. villages with Rambot-generated entries. (Probably less inhabitants, though.) Eugene van der Pijll 22:26, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Looks perfectly legitimate to me. Gwalla | Talk 00:08, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Extraterrestrial features are worth maintaining. Denni 02:31, 2004 Oct 15 (UTC)
  • Hmm, well, on the the one hand, we have a List of craters on the Moon, and it kind of looks funny that some are blue links while others are red... but on the other hand, "...The Moon is covered with tens of thousands of craters having a diameter of at least 1 kilometre...". That's a lot of potential articles about nothing more than green cheese.... func(talk) 05:06, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • ummm Keep. I wonder where the first Moon colony will end up? The Steve 07:52, Oct 15, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep RustyCale 11:36, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep I can't think of any reason for deletion. jni 12:06, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Geographical features are encyclopedic, also when they are on other planets or moons. Thue | talk 20:37, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep DCEdwards1966 17:34, Oct 18, 2004 (UTC)

Keep as it is a contribution (albeit minor) to knowledge about the universe. And can we get this off the deletion page given the near overwhelming support for it. --eleuthero 23:54, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion