Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raj Bhakta

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tally: I count 13 delete, 4 keep or maybe 5 if User:Kuwanger is counted. I have deleted Raj Bhakta. Wile E. Heresiarch 04:10, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)


Raj Bhakta: game show contestant. Participating in a game show is not evidence of notability. Come back after he wins the grand prize. Wile E. Heresiarch 14:20, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)

  • Delete -- Graham ☺ | Talk 15:28, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete -- Necrothesp 17:13, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable contestant. Photo is probable copyvio (and features a ridiculous tie). Gwalla | Talk 17:27, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: Twerp in a bowtie, part of the Celebrating Greed series on television. Delete for not being notable. Geogre 18:23, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete - Tεxτurε 19:35, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete, I protest mightily at some user's disdain of Greed. I don't even know that winning the grand prize will get enough notability. I mean, who cares about the dude that won Apprentice 1? -Vina 20:04, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • His suit appears to be made out of my old curtains (disclaimer: it was the ex-wife's taste). But enough of this prittle-prattle, Delete non-entity. --Ianb 20:54, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable game show contestant.
  • Delete. Unless and until he becomes of note separate from this gameshow, there is no need for an article. Average Earthman 18:16, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. I don't know what you mean by Greed; this guy was on The Apprentice 2, a show which causes more water-cooler talk than I've ever seen. The show has a cult following and if every minor character and place in Star Trek, Star Wars, Pokemon and other fictional universes can have pages, I think a REAL live person on a reality (NOT game) show should have one.[[User:Nricardo|--Nelson Ricardo >>Talk<<]] 15:34, Sep 19, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. The winner *might* warrant a break-out article, but not every participant. BTW, if there's a "winner", I'd say it's a "game" show. Niteowlneils 21:29, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep Lets not say to delete this page because we do not like the Percieved charter of the show or the show in it's self. If we were to say that no charaters except the winner should deserve a page then so be it, but this page give information about a charater in a show that's status is still unknown. I say we decide if any contesent on any reality show should have a page or not, rather than a piticular person. Asian Animal
  • Keep Survivor, The Apprentice 1, and other shows all have contestant articles (even contestants who did not end up winning). I see no reason for this to be deleted, only expanded. - MattTM 04:12, Sep 21, 2004 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect into List of Apprentice 2 candidates Kuwanger 07:14, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
    Note: above user has only four edits, 2 in VfD. Tεxτurε 15:56, 21 Sep 2004
  • Delete. Not notable. An expanded article won't make a non-notable person notable. --Improv 15:54, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep I think most of the votes to delete are coming from people who aren't fans of the show or reality tv as a whole. Raj, through his actions and manner of dress, has certainly proven himself notable in this cast of the show. Inturnaround 17:28, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Apropos, I don't think winning at a game show confers encylopaedic notability, either. -- WOT 18:30, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)