Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burningdown

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 05:02, May 10, 2005 (UTC)

Burningdown

Vanity band posting. Delete. Postdlf 07:37, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete The page has also been vandalised at least twice since appearing here. Binabik80 16:00, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. One of the anonymous users who vandalised the page was the article's original author who blanked the entire page, both the VFD tag and the content. [1]. I'm not sure if it is a signal that this user also wants it to be deleted. Zzyzx11 | Talk 17:53, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Yes, he did acknowledge this on Postdlf's talk page. [2]. Zzyzx11 | Talk 17:55, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • He's since returned to editing the content[3] so we might as well play this out. Postdlf 18:13, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, band vanity. Megan1967 01:33, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. Quale 04:39, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
• The page has been (almost) blanked again - this time the anon did leave the vfd notice and a substub, but I've reverted anyway as a lot of information was summarily deleted. Note that there are two different IPs at work, which may or may not be the same person. Oh, for what it's worth, delete like all other student garage bands. sjorford →•← 18:53, 3 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.