Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commonwealth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article Commonwealth Secondary listed on WP:VFD Apr 30 to May 7 2004, consensus was to delete. Discussion:

Not written in the style of an encylopedia article; possibly also non-encyclopedic subject. -- The Anome 06:02, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)

  • "Mrs Neo SF]] A very enthusiastic teacher who has a very cute and round tummy" - OK . . . I would most likely say . . . delete. If rewritten, it might be done so that historical facts (e.g. about the school, and not about current teachers ) are discussed. --Phil Larin 06:19, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Quite odd, BJAODN candidate. Delete. -- Cyrius|&#9998 06:36, Apr 30, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. School prank page. Go to the Talk page to see what I mean. Alcarillo 07:24, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • As said before, when I suggested the page for speedy deletion, it is funny but not encyclopedic. It also hurts peoples feelings. So Delete. I do agree that if the authors feel to write something more serious than that's OK. Vanderesch 08:54, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. I'm not certain whether schools are encyclopedic or not. But this article is not. I would even support speedy delete. Andris 01:28, May 1, 2004 (UTC)
  • Move to BJAODN. Rhymeless 02:22, 1 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
    • No BJAODN if it's about a real school and real teachers. Andris 03:02, May 1, 2004 (UTC)
    • If article is fact, then leave it, send for major cleanup, remove bias/opinions. If article false, send to BJAODN. Quite funny; but might be hurting 03:02, May 1, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. This looks like an elaborate prank. Even if it's real, it's weird enough to go to BJAODN. - Lucky 6.9 23:47, 1 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete. absolutely. this is obviously personal attacks based on the bias of one or few students in the school. not enriching, not enlightening, but hurting.
  • keep. An oddity - should be more serious, major redo shld do Karl 02:22, 2 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not encyclopedic. There does not appear to be anything remotely notable about this high school. olderwiser 16:36, 1 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: prank. Nothing encyclopedic going on here. Wile E. Heresiarch 21:06, 1 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete:nonsense Elektron21:36, 1 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
    • If moved to BJAODN, remove pictures of teachers (which someone added while we were discussing deletion) and other sensitive information. Andris 04:08, May 2, 2004 (UTC)
    • BJAODN isn't the right place for it, since it's not funny. Wile E. Heresiarch 00:59, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
    • Does not belong on BJAODN - Tεxτurε 15:46, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article appears to be becoming an edit war. Probably needs protection until this debate is over. DJ Clayworth 14:34, 5 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete by the way. And it's not funny. And I believe that we should reduce this down to a stub now so as not to be insulting to the teachers. How would we like it if our least favourite co-workers wrote an article about us here? DJ Clayworth 14:45, 5 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

End discussion