Talk:Harad

Harad has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 13, 2020. (Reviewed version).

Middle-earth Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle-earth, which aims to build an encyclopedic guide to J. R. R. Tolkien, his legendarium, and related topics. Please visit the project talk page for suggestions and ideas on how you can improve this and other articles.Middle-earthWikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earthTemplate:WikiProject Middle-earthTolkien articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note: Though it states in the Guide to writing better articles that generally fictional articles should be written in present tense, all Tolkien legendarium-related articles that cover in-universe material before the current action must be written in past tense. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earth/Standards for more information about this and other article standards.

Archives

1

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Minor places in Arda#Eastern Sea|Eastern Sea]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Delhi Sultanate[edit]

The fantasy world of "Harad" could be evidence that "Delhi Sultanate" has a presence in literature.

The presence of massive "War elephant" is more proof that Harad is the "Indian subcontinent".

08:16, 27 January 2023 (UTC)~~/08:16, 27 January 2023 (UTC)08:16, 27 January 2023 (UTC)~~ 43.242.178.51 (talk) 08:16, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are entitled to your personal opinion, but since that cannot be verified by other editors, we cannot use it in the article. Of course, if a scholar has made a similar suggestion, we can cite that book or research paper. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:13, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

King of Colombo[edit]

Corsairs of Umbar are metaphorically the "King of Colombo". 19:47, 18 February 2023 (UTC)19:47, 18 February 2023 (UTC)19:47, 18 February 2023 (UTC)~////////////19:47, 18 February 2023 (UTC)19:47, 18 February 2023 (UTC)43.242.178.214 (talk) 43.242.178.214 (talk) 19:47, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are entitled to your personal opinion, but since that cannot be verified by other editors, we cannot use it in the article. Of course, if a scholar has made a similar suggestion, we can cite that book or research paper. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:57, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Catalan Atlas of 1375[edit]

Harad is metaphorically the Delhi Sultanate, their mighty Mumakil War elephant species is the much needed evidence.

The Corsair of Umbar is the King of Colombo.

My evidence is the Catalan Atlas of 1375.

21:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)21:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)21:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)21:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)137.59.145.217 (talk)\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\21:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)21:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)21:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)137.59.145.217 (talk)\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\21:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)21:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)21:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)21:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)~~\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\21:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)137.59.145.217 (talk)[reply]

Um, on the war elephant, Tolkien explicitly gave a Roman source, so your "evidence" is incorrect. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

India and Ceylon[edit]

Harad is India and Umbar is Ceylon, just as the Catalan Atlas of 1375 explained.

21:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)21:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)21:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)21:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\21:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)21:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)21:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)137.59.145.217 (talk) 21:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\21:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)21:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)21:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)~[reply]

I note your personal opinion that there could be an oriental interpretation of Harad. However, you cannot cite a PRIMARY source like the medieval Catalan Atlas, as obviously that says nothing about whether Tolkien (centuries later) knew of the source or used it. What would be required would be a scholarly source that says in terms that Tolkien saw the atlas and may have been influenced by it. Without that, all your speculations are ORIGINAL RESEARCH and are forbidden on Wikipedia. You have made your opinion known, but without further evidence, it cannot go anywhere, so please stop now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:32, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]