User talk:Dougalc

Here are some tips to help you get started:

If you haven't already, please add your name to the new user log to let others know a little about yourself.
Read the article describing how to edit a page and feel free to experiment in the Sandbox.
When editing pages, use the preview button before submitting and try to fill in the summary box for every edit.
Eventually, read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!
Jrdioko

P.S. One last helpful hint. To sign your posts like I did above (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).

Taxoboxes[edit]

Hi Dougalc - my reason is that I think it is quite important that the taxobox head should be the same as the page title; though equally, precisely because it is a taxobox giving the taxon's scientific hierarchy, I'd say it could very reasonably be argued that the scientific name should be used there even where the page name is a common name. On a minor formatting aside, you'd also left the name in italics (2 x ' at the start and end of the italicised text), which common names of course aren't. - MPF 08:29, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The note at WP:TX is just copied from the same at WP:TOL, so it is in effect saying it should be the same as the page title. Page titling is likely to be changed 'officially' fairly soon; quite a lot of contributors feel that plants should all or nearly all be at sci names, so the formal recommendations are a bit out of date with current opinion (the common name recommendation was made long ago when there were several birders but few or no botanists contributing to wikipedia; birds have much more stable semi-official common names, plants don't). Have a look through the WP:TOL talk archives, it's been discussed a fair few times with a majority in favour of this change; while no formal change has yet been added to the project page, it is likely to happen sometime. BTW I like your other edits at Agathis australis, nice work! - MPF 15:49, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi![edit]

Hi! I notice you've been editing here a couple of years without getting a welcome from another Kiwi (I presume that you're from NZ or at least interested in NZ from the contributions you list on your user page). So... er... welcome! You may (or may not) be interested in our Collaboration of the Fortnight, the occasionally updated list of NZ pages up for deletion (currently empty), or the NZ Wiki notice board. In any case, happy editing! Ziggurat 02:37, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Dougalc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]