Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naziniggers

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (22:31, 6 Jun 2005 Neutrality deleted "Naziniggers" (Per VfD.)) - Mailer Diablo 21:06, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Naziniggers

In the absence of any claim to notability, this is likely to be either trolling or advertising. Delete --Rlandmann 00:47, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete advertising. Fire Star 00:50, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Advertising--1pezguy 00:54, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, alexa rank of 385,768, Wikipedia is not a directory of porn sites. --nixie 00:55, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete advertising -CunningLinguist 01:02, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Not advertising -- The article doesn't protray website in a positive light, and doesn't try to convince the reader to go there. It's like saying the page on Microsoft, or any other company, is advertising. This article also might be useful to anyone who wants to verify if this website exists without going there. Kayeff 01:11, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• User's first edit.

• Delete. WP is not a web directory. Gamaliel 01:12, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. For more reasons than I can spend time writing here. DJ Clayworth 01:15, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep The entry, judging by the lack of any tone of solicitation, is most certainly not an advertisement. While Wikipedia is not a web directory, the article is notable for the exceptional subject matter presented and its retainment merits special attention in this light.[[205.188.117.65 01:16, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)]]
• Keep not advertising. Knowledge of this site even for those who do not wish to view it is essential to the full internet experience.70.107.182.175 01:54, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. It is advertising unless you cite third party references to verify that it is noteworthy beyond the average porn site. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 01:56, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Hehe. "Knowledge of this site is essential to the full internet experience". At least you made me laugh out loud.... But, sorry: Delete. Though, maybe you could use that slogan in a TV-commercial for the site, or something? ;-). Shanes 02:02, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable trollcruft. Antandrus (talk) 02:04, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I don't feel this is notable. --Barfooz (talk) 02:09, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable, not encyclopedic. Wikipedia is not a web directory.Tobycat 04:11, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. No notability. DS1953 04:33, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia isn't a web directory, however, this could be incorporated into Shock_Site, or something to that effect. Conradrock 05:28, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Is it even notable enough to merit THAT MUCH? The first time I ever even heard about this site was this VfD entry, I had at least heard about some of the other shock sites in that article -CunningLinguist 06:35, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia isn't a directory of shocking pornography. I know WP:NOT doesn't say that, but it should! A Man In Black 05:28, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable, and the article lacks any useful content whatsoever besides the URL. Maybe if there was some media controversy or anything, but there isn't. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 06:19, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Ranks too low on Alexa, little content besides the obvious. Maybe a merge into shock site is appropriate, but this is not noteworthy enough to stay on its own. Mgm|^(talk) 09:56, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non notable. JamesBurns 10:29, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Nazinigger? Anybody else see this as completelly innapropriate?--192.139.27.18 15:56, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.