Talk:Hovenweep National Monument

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Colorado / Utah Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to improve, create, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the New section tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!
	Utah portal This article is supported by WikiProject Utah (assessed as Low-importance).

Archaeology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments welcome[edit]

Began this article as a companion to the Ancient Pueblo Peoples and other Southwest native people articles. Comments welcome. WBardwin 09:46, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Wolf berry[edit]

What is meant here by "wolf berry"? The article wolfberry describes two species native to China, with a note pointing to Symphoricarpos. Is the latter intended here? Thanks — Pekinensis 03:56, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

good question -- there is a nightshade berry native to the wetlands of Southern North America - Carolina Wolf-berry Lycium carolinianum. But that is probably not what is referred to here, in a very desert environment. A Lycium sp. (Wolf-berry) is described as a desert plant, with usually spiny brances and leaves in clusters. Will continue looking............ WBardwin 03:03, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This section snatched from an online discussion of Southwest native plants might provide a source:

Rea, Amadeo M. At the Desert's Green Edge, An Ethnobotany of the Gila River Pima Sumi-e illustrations by Takashi Ijichi. University of Arizona Press, 1997. ISBN 0816515409.

In Shreve and Wiggins (1964) Vegetation and Flora of the Sonoran Desert, the authors have about 10 pages on Lycium spp. Some keying infor, but no drawings or photos, though. A source that has given me some hope of figuring out Lycium spp. around Phx is Amadeo Rea's At the Desert's Green Edge: An Ethnobotany of the Gila River Pima. As Lycium fruits were an important food source for the Gileños, there is some effort to nail things down in the book. Of course, the discussion is limited to a few species (2 or 3?) and to the lower Gila drainage. Even if it doesn't answer all of your Lycium questions, the Rea book is a treasure trove of information about native plants. WBardwin 03:18, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Park System"[edit]

I just modified the sentence: President Warren G. Harding proclaimed Hovenweep a unit of the National Park System on March 2, 1923. Even though National Parks and the National Park Service were well established in 1923, the term "National Park System" was created by the National Park System General Authorities Act of 1970 (Pubic Law 91–383 (August 18, 1970) / 84 Stat. 825 / 16 USC 1a-1). — Eoghanacht ^talk 15:01, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Navajo / Ute on Hovenweep[edit]

I've moved the following to the discussion tab for the following reasons:

"===Navajo and Ute nations===

Nomadic Southern Athapaskan speaking peoples, given the name Navajo by the Spanish, succeeded the Pueblo people in this region by approximately AD 1620 to 1650. Ute tribal groups also frequented this region, primarily during hunting and raiding activities. The modern Navajo Nation lies southeast of Hovenweep, and many Navajo (more appropriately known as the Diné) live in surrounding areas, particularly near the San Juan River."

1) If the Ute and Navajo did not want to travel on the land of the Hovenweep ruins, it's not a great idea to suggest that they might have lived there. 2) Having a hard time finding credible citations for this information. 3) I wonder if the original point of this paragraph was that they lived in the area, which was true - just possibly not at Hovenweep. Any thoughts about this? Credible sources? Thanks!--CaroleHenson (talk) 06:13, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hovenweep National Monument. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111015070239/http://crm.cr.nps.gov/archive/23-01/23-01-9.pdf to http://crm.cr.nps.gov/archive/23-01/23-01-9.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:05, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copy edit needed[edit]

There are a few spots in this article where copy edit is needed. I'll put it on my ever-growing list. Dgndenver (talk) 02:43, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]