Talk:Birds of Pray

Rolling Stone review

Perhaps we should junk the link to the RS review and replace it with maybe the AMG one? The RS one is a horrible review. It had no justification of the rating of 2/5. Nothing negative to say, nothing positive. Useless. Paulmer2003 (talk) 03:16, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Putting Rolling Stone reviews in articles has proved a waste of time as all the links are dead now! I think you might have to be a subscriber to see them. So the AMG one is going in! Iangurteen (talk) 16:31, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

OK, someone had beaten me to it with the AMG review, so I've deleted the RS review and put in one I found at Shaking Through (Not very favourable but at least it justifies it's mark!) Iangurteen (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Birds of Pray. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091212003425/http://www.alternativeaddiction.com:80/newmusic/exec/albumreviews.asp?id=22 to http://www.alternativeaddiction.com/newmusic/exec/albumreviews.asp?id=22

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:27, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Birds of Pray. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120509185509/http://stylusmagazine.com/reviews/live/birds-of-pray.htm to http://stylusmagazine.com/reviews/live/birds-of-pray.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:54, 20 July 2017 (UTC)