Talk:The Piper at the Gates of Dawn

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Piper at the Gates of Dawn article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 15 days

The Piper at the Gates of Dawn has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 27, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Pink Floyd Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pink Floyd, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pink Floyd on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pink FloydWikipedia:WikiProject Pink FloydTemplate:WikiProject Pink FloydPink Floyd articles

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was a past project collaboration.

To-do list:

Fair use

Add fair use rationale to all images and sound samples (all except images already labeled free use).
Re-size large images around to 300 pixels (all "fair use" images), other than album covers (already done).

Articles

Expand all articles to at least Start class. Some song stubs can't be expanded and should be redirected to the relevant album article. Use the "Interstellar Overdrive" article as an example when editing a song stub.
Expand all of the Floyd's studio album articles to at least GA status.
See COTM for monthly collabs.

Project building

Add WikiProject Pink Floyd banner {{WPFloyd}} to all appropriate Talk pages.
Personally invite quality editors working on Pink Floyd articles to join the project.

If you complete one of these tasks, please remove it from the list.

This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one?

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Progressive Rock Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GAN concerns[edit]

Article currently has numerous citation needed tags. Ritchie333 You think you'd be able to assist in getting these resolved? Otherwise I'm going to take it to GAR. Thanks. – zmbro _{(talk) (cont)} 21:39, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Zmbro: I can probably fix all these, but I am busy pretty much all weekend and I'm struggling to think of a free evening I've got to check my book sources and fix everything up. I do intend to do it at the first possible opportunity, though! Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:12, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ritchie333 I'll check out the other Floyd GAs as well and report back if they need tweaking. I unfortunately have no Floyd material so I can't be that much help. – zmbro _{(talk) (cont)} 15:33, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No probs. AFAIK the ones I personally took to GA should be alright, though stuff does occasionally slip through when I'm not keeping an eye on them, plus I've got better at writing and presenting stuff in the last ten years anyway. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a quick look, and there is far more unsourced and unverifiable content than what's just tagged, a bunch of fan sites (which should not be used in a GA; often received wisdom by fans has been contradicted by official sources years later), some sources are not formatted correctly, and there's a general feeling that I probably should have watchlisted this and kept an eye on it. I'll see what else I can do, but if you want to send it to GAR (with the intent of getting wider support), that might not be a bad solution. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:50, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]