Talk:Cacophony Society

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Website?[edit]

If the Suicide Club is defunct, how can it have an official web site? ---Isaac R 02:52, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

SC does not have official Website, CS does. Jvol (talk) 21:32, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The worst article on Wikipedia[edit]

I think this may be the one. 58.232.101.30 (talk) 03:36, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen worse. This one is pretty bad, though. References are desperately needed, and a lot of it should be rewritten. -kotra (talk) 03:44, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The information is completely unclear, and it generally confuses me. I don't find it at all readable, but I don't know how to fix it. The topic is hard to research. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.195.18.184 (talk) 00:23, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

clarity will be an uphill battle, for this article. unclarity is one of the subject's hallmarks. Jvol (talk) 21:32, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chapters[edit]

Adding to the article's badness is the pointless organization by "chapters" I challenge you to find a good article about an organization that is structured this way.

response: agreed, the article is rudimentary, badly needs more references. Organization by city is not pointless, however. Comparison to articles about organizations is of limited use. Cacophony Society is more of a movement than an organization. articles about movements do have geographical sections (example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dada ) CS is an idea, and an (extremely loose) affiliation - mainly a communication network. Its philosophy is, in fact, anti-organization. Therefore, its difficult to make generalizations that fully apply to all "chapters"- the major ones have their own unique histories (one of them did/does, in fact, have some organization - a source of controversy). therefore it makes sense to have separate descriptions. (If nothing else, it encourages authors familiar with each group to take responsibility for their own descriptions - as people in Portland, LA, and SF have begun to do, so far. hopefully we'll see more from Seattle, Chicago, NYC, London, Tokyo, et cetera). Jvol (talk) 21:24, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not to mention that this group's members include the author of Fight Club and is inspiration for Fight Club's Project Mayhem, two important things missing from this article. As far as I could tell.

97.113.105.182 (talk) 19:11, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This group's members also include persons not the author of Fight Club, some of whom have never read Fight Club, or could care less about Fight Club. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.127.3.249 (talk) 02:29, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cacophony Society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130508215924/http://www.lastgasp.com/blog/publishing/tales-of-the-san-francisco-cacophony-society/ to http://www.lastgasp.com/blog/publishing/tales-of-the-san-francisco-cacophony-society/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:17, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]