Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Podolski

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. --TenOfAllTrades(talk) 23:40, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Podolski

Bad title, no content, doesn't get much more pathetic than this. Denni☯ 01:19, 2005 May 29 (UTC)

• Moved, wikified. It's a nanostub, but as long as it isn't part of a large spree of them I can live with it. And if you think it doesn't get much more pathetic than this, you haven't been around VfD long enough… Weak keep. --W(t) 01:31, 2005 May 29 (UTC)
• Delete, notability not established. I'll bet there are a thousand unencyclopedic German footballers. Ryan Prior 01:40, May 29, 2005 (UTC)
  • There, added a claim to notability. And no, I'm not going to write an article on FC Koln. --W(t) 01:48, 2005 May 29 (UTC)
• Keep professional athletes, especially if FC Koln is the same as 1. FC Köln Kappa 02:33, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
  • That's the one yes. At least I assume it is, as you may have gathered by now I don't know much about professional football. --W(t) 02:37, 2005 May 29 (UTC)
• Keep. We need to be a little more tolerant of newbie ineptitude. ----Isaac R 04:01, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, notable. Eixo 07:20, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep He's a 1. FC Köln player. Certainly notable and easily verifiable. Phils 10:11, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand as professional footballer. Capitalistroadster 00:55, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
• K Fawcett5 04:17, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, expanded with basic info. Dryazan 22:44, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.