User talk:MarXidad

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

See also User talk:66.241.130.74


Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need any questions answered about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or drop me a line. BTW, I wikified some of your contributions for you. Cheers! --maveric149

Looking for Burning Man Sources[edit]

I am trying to provide better sources for articles in Category:Burning Man, so I have started a collection of academic, journalistic, and other sources on the event and related subculture. If you know of any or run across them in your web surfing in the future, please add them to User:Todfox/Burning Man/Sources. Thanks! Kit 21:53, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

please remove your own external link from Burning man[edit]

I was going to put this on the burning man talk page, but decided I'd just ask you straight away.

I had placed {{Cleanup-spam}} before the external links section in hopes that a neutral party would come along and clean this up, but it was removed by an owner of one of the external links. Having spent a fair amount of time since the last discussion addressing External links and specifically Linkspam, it kills me to see you continue to defend your own personal home page on this article. There is no way this would be held up by public review by the wikipedia community. Furthermore, I think it is easily fair to say that your site does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article here would have once it becomes an example of brilliant prose. (from WP:EL). Will you please remove this blatant vanity linkspam without further issue. If it makes you feel any better, go ahead remove a few other links also warrenting removal. Thanks, and seriously, nothing personal, but your site doesn't belong here! here 09:15, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I feel like a dick for harrassing you about this, particularly on burning man. I hope that the content you've collected is eventually integrated into the article. Best ;), see you at the festivals! here 23:18, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Burning Man Regional Events Infobox[edit]

I've started putting together an Infobox that can go on the Burning Man type events pages. When you have a few moments and can look at the example I've put together, I'd appreciate any comments you might have. Thanks, and Burn On! SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 14:04, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RSD Game-Maker[edit]

Hey. Do I understand correctly that you used to use Recreational Software Designs' Game-Maker? If you want to talk about it, you can track me down at aderack.com. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.114.143.115 (talk) 16:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article House of City has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be unencyclopedic and completely unsourced. Three refs are: Facebook (not a RS), Wikipedia (not valid as a ref) and a general intro to heredity, irrelevant to the point being "referenced".

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 20:43, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PamD (talkcontribs)

Hello. This article appears to be -- to say the least -- unsupported by reliable sources, and on the face of it appears to be a hoax article. If you can demonstrate that this meets the general notability guidelines, you should be able to recreate it without getting it deleted again -- if not, it will, alas, keep on getting deleted.

Please note that writing a Wikipedia article for something does not make it real. You seem to have gone to some effort to create this thing, including backdated maintenance tags, and a logo you seem to have created yourself: can I ask why? Is this meant to be part of an alternate reality game, an attempt at creating a micronation, a joke, a breaching experiment? Or something else? -- The Anome (talk) 21:50, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Speed metal for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Speed metal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speed metal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I call the big one bitey 09:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool[edit]

Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 23:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lusatian culture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lusitanian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, MarXidad. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, MarXidad. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, MarXidad. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society[edit]

Dear MarXidad,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 19:50, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]