Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cairns Christian College

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 02:43, May 23, 2005 (UTC)

Cairns Christian College[edit]

Non-notable. Delete. Neutralitytalk 04:55, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete unless wikipedia wants a boring, pointless article for every average school in every country. CDThieme
  • Keep and expand all secondary schools. Etc. etc. --BaronLarf 05:33, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep schools. Verifiable and NPOV. First, preserve knowledge, then expand knowledge. Thanks to Neutrality, I've had no time for adding content today. --Unfocused 05:40, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Wikipedia is not triviapedia. Gmaxwell 05:51, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Kappa 05:58, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, not notable, schools cruft. Megan1967 06:10, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, just because you're Christian doesn't mean you're not cruft as well. Master Thief Garrett 07:37, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete vanity. Jonathunder 09:14, 2005 May 17 (UTC)
  • Merge into Cairns, Queensland and delete - Skysmith 09:29, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep.JuntungWu 12:42, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Verifiable. Good stub. Just over a month old, so it's far too early to see if it'll grow or not. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 13:12, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Subject should be verifiable. - SimonP 13:23, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Encyclopedic, verifiable and NPOV. Meets all agreed-upon Wikipedia standards. Like some others, I will be copy-pasting this to all the high school votes since Neutrality seems to have mass-suggested articles for VfD simply because of a POV judgment of their subject--Cynical 13:44, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. K-12's are inherently notable because the entire maturation experience occurs there for some. -- BD2412 thimkact 14:04, 2005 May 17 (UTC)
  • Keep this fine little article Lupin 14:12, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep schools in wikipedia. --Howrealisreal 14:51, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, vanity. Radiant_* 15:02, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge/Consolidate into article on area private schools. — RJH 15:50, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep -- Longhair | Talk 17:00, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep schools. Inherently notable (expect to be seeing this posted quite a few times). R Calvete 19:48, 2005 May 17 (UTC)
  • Delete. Useless collection of generic facts about an insignificant school. This is not an encyclopedia article. Individual schools are not inherently encyclopedic and there is nothing to distinguish insignificant schools like this one from thousands of nearly identical schools around the world. Gamaliel 20:24, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the schoolcruft. Ketsuban has spoken. The debate is over. 21:07, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Bogus (non-policy) nomination - notability is still not a listed deletion criterion - David Gerard 23:16, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • And there still isn't an exclusive list of deletion criteria, making this particularly beaten dead horse. Ambi 04:24, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • See What to do with a problem page on the official policy page on deletion. This is a stub with potential for expansion. According to our official policy it should be sent to cleanup, not listed for deletion. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 11:10, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Non-notable. Quale 23:51, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge into Cairns, Queensland per my school article policy. Kelly Martin 02:04, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep - stub only created 13 April 2005, and needs time to develop. Another school in Cairns with similar amount of detail survived a VfD in 2004. Noteability is inherently POV and should not be used as the only criteria for deletion.--Takver 03:12, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Valid stub, invalid and premature nomination for deletion by nominator. —RaD Man (talk) 07:42, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Lots of articles start out as mere stubs. AGree with Radman1. Visit Schoolwatch to vote on other schools up for vfd. --Zantastik 18:28, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Introduce a limit of 3 nominations per day. CalJW 18:43, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Introduce a limit on school articles shorter than 3 sentences. Jayjg (talk) 18:25, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep please and introduce a limit on nominators with less than 3 brain cells. Yuckfoo 18:36, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Notable school made of stardust that is worthy of inclusion. User:GRider/Schoolwatch Klonimus 23:35, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cairns_Christian_College&oldid=1142177451"