Talk:Rafah

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Palestine Mid‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Egypt High‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Opening comment[edit]

Working on it. waiting for the library to open - can't find anything online. Ridiculous. 80.178.69.175 10:16, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Anti-Tank Missiles[edit]

I made a change from the term "anti-tank missiles" being fired at IDF forces to "RPG" (rocket propelled grenade), which is more accurate. If there is evidence of an anti-tank missiles (missiles are guided, rockets are not), being used, I'd love to hear it because I'd be curious. If so, change back. Terrapin

Rafah and the Rephaim?[edit]

Could the village of Rafah possible have any connection to the "RAPHA" or "REPHAIM" mentioned in the Bible?

Needs a picture[edit]

The article needs at least a skyline photo of Rafah, to enrich the article. Once somebody finds and uploads one add it to the infobox. Al Ameer son

I agree, but I removed the photo of the bombed mosque because it was an obvious effort to push POV rather than illustrate the subject Edgespath24 (talk) 12:06, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We can take it out of the info-box, but sadly, the picture *does* illustrate the subject. Inserting it into the body. Huldra (talk) 20:18, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Only crossing?[edit]

I see referenes online and at Sufa to the "Sufa crossing" between Israel and the Gaza Strip. Have there been any others since the end of the 1948 war? Have they all since been closed? -- Beland 20:50, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I think this meant to say it's the only crossing between Gaza and Egypt. -- Beland 16:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mosque in Rafah, destroyed during the Gaza War.[edit]

there is no place for this pic. it will be better to have no pic at all. Nachum (talk) 07:32, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I wish we had a better picture, but we don´t. I cannot see that the article would be better without pictures, though. If you find a better picture with a licence which we can use, please upload it. Huldra (talk) 20:17, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rafiah[edit]

Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)#General guidelines: "Relevant foreign language names (one used by at least 10% of sources in the English language or is used by a group of people which used to inhabit this geographical place) are permitted." Rafiah and the whole Gaza Strip were de facto part of Israel between 1967 and 2005; therefore, according to the guidelines, the Hebrew name is permitted -- especially since the transliteration of the Hebrew name is already there. --My another account (talk) 12:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Its not relevant, it was not de facto a part of Israel at any time (occupation is not sovereignty), and ive removed the transliteration to deal with the more pedantic part of your argument. nableezy - 15:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

occupation is not sovereignty -- so what? Dunkirk and Lviv both give a German name in the lead, Daugavpils and Tskhinvali both give a Russian name, Nablus and Hebron both give a Hebrew name, how many more counterexamples do you need? --My another account (talk) 21:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You said it was de facto a part of Israel. The part you quote of my response is in regard to that falsehood. Hebron has a Hebrew speaking population and a Biblical history that warrants the inclusion of Hebrew, Nablus likewise has such a history. Rafah however does not. nableezy - 22:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have a couple of older Israeli maps which include Gaza Strip and West Bank as part of Israel, not even showing any border between them. Do you want me to scan them? Or what would you accept as an evidence that Israel had treated these territories as part of the country? --My another account (talk) 22:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lol no need. Israel never ever ever treated the Gaza Strip, or indeed the West Bank with the exception of East Jerusalem, as part of Israel. nableezy - 23:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome to back your conjecture with any evidence. I have presented mine. --My another account (talk) 08:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the above, I want to note that many articles about Israeli cities with mainly Jewish population (Eilat, Beersheba, Ashkelon, Ashdod, Tel Aviv, Caesarea, Tiberias, Haifa, Safed, and perhaps others) include the Arabic name in the lead, and take no offense at it. Why should the rules for Palestinian cities be any different? --My another account (talk) 22:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since Arabic is an official language in Israel (together with Hebrew, of course), *all* places -and persons- in Israel should have the names in both Hebrew and Arabic, Huldra (talk) 22:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know about including it for all people, but for places yes, as Huldra mentioned Arabic is an official language of Israel. Hebrew however is not an official language of the Palestinian Authority. nableezy - 23:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@My another account: Regarding the guideline, it allows for an etymology section instead of alternative names in the lead, which this article already has, and then says "Once such a section or paragraph is created, the alternative English or foreign names should not be moved back to the first line." Therefore you were in fact editing against the guideline. You need a better reason for your edit and I don't see one. Zero^talk 23:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A great many articles, including Palestine itself, do have an etymology section and a multitude of alternative names in the lead, so the guideline doesn't seem to reflect the established practice. I have started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names). --My another account (talk) 08:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Rafah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hrw.org/reports/2004/rafah1004/rafah1004text.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hrw.org/reports/2004/rafah1004/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hrw.org/campaigns/gaza/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131104160006/http://unispal.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/6558F61D3DB6BD4505256593006B06BE to http://unispal.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/6558F61D3DB6BD4505256593006B06BE
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070212181417/http://domino.un.org/unispal.nsf/9a798adbf322aff38525617b006d88d7/858c88eb973847f4802564b5003d1083%21OpenDocument to http://domino.un.org/unispal.nsf/9a798adbf322aff38525617b006d88d7/858c88eb973847f4802564b5003d1083%21OpenDocument

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:24, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rafah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140223185030/http://en.climate-data.org/location/3958/ to http://en.climate-data.org/location/3958/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:55, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Rafah-camp-2016.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:52, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Humanitar[edit]

https://www.inn.co.il/flashes/969325 2.55.12.247 (talk) 10:53, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from being in Hebrew 2.55.12.247 the report about the IDF spokesman in Arabic's announcement of a tactical truce between 10:00 and 14:00 isn't really relevant to this page. Mcljlm (talk) 14:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 8 March 2024[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

add to the page Meandmybrix (talk) 07:25, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: the copyright status of that file seems iffy to me. Either a) it is official and not the uploader's own work, and they have violated copyright by uploading it to commons under CC, b) it is unofficial and their own work, so not encyclopedic, or c) it is official and their own work, which would be pretty strange and I would want to see a source where it is used. If it is their real logo can you give a source? HansVonStuttgart (talk) 07:50, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of "State of Palestine"[edit]

Hi, on 12 February an anonymous / logged-off user removed all four mentions of "State of Palestine" in the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rafah&diff=prev&oldid=1206530279 I believe it should be readded, don't know what you think. 84.109.78.250 (talk) 09:05, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, fixed, but please format this kind of thing as an edit request next time per WP:MAKINGEREQ because of WP:ARBECR Sean.hoyland (talk) 09:26, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Offensive[edit]

Netanyahu just approved an offensive into Rafah. Refugeee numbers prob need to be updated, current event tag, and section in history is needed soon. IEditPolitics (talk) 01:31, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]