Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foxism

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Jinian (nonsense) --cesarb 01:14, 7 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Foxism[edit]

joke entry ... Samw forgot to sign this

Delete - joke entry ... Samw forgot to sign this
Delete -- unfunny would-be-joke entry. -- Hoary 04:37, 2005 May 1 (UTC)
Delete, mildly amusing but not funny enough for bjaodn. Megan1967 04:50, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unfunny nonsense. Quale 04:51, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not funny, just weird. I'd have speedied it myself. It probably doesn't *technically* fit, but if it's not BJAODN-worthy then it probably shouldn't be dragged through the Vfd... Master Thief Garrett 10:57, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe Wikimedia should sell space on the starting a new article page to GeoCities? (Delete patiently; let it wait out the vote.) Samaritan 17:04, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, and I would have speedied it myself too if it hadn't been put on VfD. --Golbez 20:24, May 1, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.