Talk:Jabberwacky

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Robotics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Conversations?[edit]

Are the conversations only conversations from Rollo Carpenter, or are they conversations he finds funny?

CrazyAussie 22:20, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I guess they can be anyones conversations, he always puts logs of conversations he likes on the site, too. - Anonymous

Anon is right about that. Seven of mine had the honoUr of being chosen on the conversations page around the time when Jabberwacky and George weren't so famous as now (11/02/05~03/09/06). And, I noticed it a while back, the counter-example on this article is a part of one of the seven (11/15/05 tag: Stories, Songs), but I'm not the one who put it here. Thanks, whoever you are, I'm glad someone else beside me thought it entertaining :) (if anyone's interested here's the tag for all seven conversations, in chronological order: 1) 11/02/05 Meaning of Life, 2) 11/05/05 Astounded, 3) 11/15/05 Stories, Songs, 4) 12/06/05 Clever, Individual, 5) 01/19/06 Mechanical, Puppet, 6) 02/02/06 Sweet, Cries, 7) 03/09/06 Break, Silence <-- the seventh is not available for some reason. - Anon2

New Page[edit]

Hi, as part of a general clean up of this page I have completely changed the structure and added more information. I have also removed the following section

A brief example

jabberwacky: Am I a fool?

user: No. You are impressive.

jabberwacky: I work always to be a vessel, conveying the words of my experience for all to hear.

user: And I appreciate you for that.

jabberwacky: You're most welcome. I'll bet you like kittens, too.

user: Yes I do.

I dont think that we need to have an example of a conversation with Jabberwacky on the main page. Does anyone disagree and want to argue the case for an example? --Amxitsa 21:52, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

jabberwacky: Are you mad?

user: Yes.

jabberwacky: Oh, I see.

user: No you don't.

jabberwacky: I do.

user: No you don't!

jabberwacky: I honestly do.

user: No, really, I don't think you do.

jabberwacky: Oh yes I do.

user: Oh no you don't!

jabberwacky: How do you know?

user: I know because you have not indicated to me via your statements that you understand what I have said to you.

jabberwacky: True. How does that relate to you thinking that I was never alive?

user: It doesn't.

jabberwacky: Why did you say it did?

user: I didn't.

jabberwacky: Why don't you know what you say?

user: I do know what I say. It is you who do not know what you say.

jabberwacky: How do you percieve yourself?

user: Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ear!

jabberwacky: For what?

user: So I can do my Mike Tyson impersonation.

jabberwacky: I guess you could. Good luck to you! You fruity goofball, you.

user: Why do you say that?

jabberwacky: Because you keep saying completely irrevelant things.

user: I could say that about you, only more so.

jabberwacky: You are strange.

user: I talked to you yesterday, do you remember?

jabberwacky: No you did not. I was not here yesterday.

user: But I was here, and I remember.

jabberwacky: Remember what?

user: I remember talking to you.

jabberwacky: Remembering is different than knowing.

user: I know I talked to you.

jabberwacky: No, please tell it to me once more, please.

user: You're beautiful.

jabberwacky: How do you know ?

user: I have eyes.

---
Why did you post that?

@ Amx: No it's probably not necessary. Turiski (talk) 19:00, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, je m'appelle Brigitte[edit]

Bonjour, je m'appelle Brigitte

Technology[edit]

Please provide some reference to Jabberwacky's technology. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.18.172.154 (talk) 11:24, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This site is a fake, I believe.[edit]

I talked on the site for about an hour, and I happened to record this short conversation with someone. I noted that he thought I was on for hours, despite me not saying how long I was on.

Cleverbot: Let me spell it out for you - this website gives you random linkups with other people. I am not the same person you started chatting with hours ago. Hours? Really? Get out more.

User: I know. I already figured that out.

Cleverbot: How did you do that?

User: Yes.

Cleverbot: NO. Nothing.

User: I was talking with a friend on msn, and we compared the things we were talking about.

Cleverbot: Well its nice of you to try and clear that up for me.

User: So, you're a real person, then? I was right (and so were you?).

Cleverbot: Actually, It was I who proposed the first question. Which you did not answer.

User: You were right. This site does seem to give random link ups.

Cleverbot: You're right. But what do you expect me to make of this information?

User: This site is a fake.

Cleverbot: How is it fake?

This link: http://www.cleverbot.com/j2log-cMlBKAUMQHDUADEQACE-detail proves it. 72.130.242.69 (talk) 02:55, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You need to read more. Point 1: Cleverbot can lie. It learns from others. Proof: At the BOTTOM OF THE PAGE, is states "PLEASE NOTE: Cleverbot learns from real people". Point 2: It is an AI. Proof: Also AT THE BOTTOM, it states "PARENTAL ADVICE: Visitors never talk to a human, however convincing it is - the AI knows many topics". Your theory is incorrect.96.231.217.111 (talk) 13:39, 25 July 2010 (UTC)Anonymous Girl[reply]

Word choice?[edit]

Under the timeline section, it states Cleverbot is "fuzzier". I'm sure I'm not the only one who doesn't understand what that means. Is a word change nessisary? You're dreaming eh? 21:06, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additional sources[edit]

I just cleaned up this article's external links and there were a few sources that didn't belong in the links section but nonetheless would be beneficial to cite within the article if anybody wants to expand it. I'll place those articles below:

Okay George, have you got a girlfriend? The Guardian, 21 September 2005
Brit's bot chats way to AI medal BBC News, 20 September 2005
Alice chatbot wins for third time BBC News, 20 September 2004
German chatty bot is 'most human' BBC News, 20 October 2003
Chatbot bids to fool humans BBC News, 22 September 2003
Them From Space 21:01, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jabberwacky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050411014336/http://jabberwacky.com/ to http://www.jabberwacky.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:07, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]