User talk:Allstar86

Harvard-Westlake Question / Welcome[edit]

Hi Allstar,

I was just curious what brought you to the Harvard-Westlake page...thanks for adding the link to the website and to Jake and Maggie Gyllenhaal. I think I searched for them fairly recently to see whether or not I should put in a link, but I can't remember having found anything.

Anyway, welcome to Wikipedia. Patrick Grey Anderson 17:40, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Airline destinations[edit]

It is proper to list a flight without a plane change as a destination. Vegaswikian 02:54, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

If you sign with 4 tildes ~~~~ it includes your signon with your comments, makes replies easier. As to your question, I have not checked what is listed on wiki destinations in detail. But in the case of Aloha, if you look at their website it clearly shows Honolulu as a direct flight, which can include stops. The flight is 441 if I remember correctly. I would like to think that showing that as a destination would be fine. I'm not sure where you would even ask for information about this. Maybe village pump in the policy section. I would think following the airline standard would be the correct decision. But like you I'm rather new so I don't know for sure. Vegaswikian 05:31, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I did a quick check at Reno/Tahoe International Airport for Aloha and it does not show Honolulu but it also states that the destinations listed are nonstop. So maybe there are two cases. One where they list direct flights and the other where they list only nonstop flights. Vegaswikian 05:40, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

TLAs[edit]

A proposal has been made at Wikipedia:Requested moves to move TLAs from AAA to DZZ and other related pages to Wikipedia namespace. Please visit Talk:TLAs from AAA to DZZ for the related discussion. -- Francs2000 | Talk 00:46, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of 'liberals wikipedians' category[edit]

Hi. I saw you're (like me) listed in this category which is up for deletion. Hoped you'd like to vote in favor of keeping it... Thanks! Larix 23:11, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for voting! Larix 16:10, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Georgia link thank you[edit]

Allstar86,
Thank you for making that edit on my user page so that Georgia is linked properly to the US state article, not the country article.
Brendenhull 23:35, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

you're welcome :] --Allstar86 14:44, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for adminship[edit]

Brendenhull would like to nominate you to be an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Brendenhull to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Allstar86. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.

Image Tagging for Image:Harvard-Westlake crest.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Harvard-Westlake crest.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:06, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Airlines of the United States[edit]

What exactly is a 'Dependent regional airline'? Would this be better listed as just regional airline? Also AK and HI should be under this heading since all of those are regional airlines.

As to your question on the usefulness, I have mixed feelings since it may be too large. In looking at this it did not seem as large I thought it might be. So maybe it would be OK.

I did some edits to stop the '•' character from starting a line. You can use the same technique for the airline names if you pipe ('|') the name for display. Vegaswikian 23:20, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your request for comment on my talk page, Template:Airlines of the United States looks good to me. I'm just hoping someone will create the missing articles for those small airlines in Alaska which provide scheduled passenger service. If anyone is interested, here's a partial list taken from the Essential Air Service article (also, a few of these are missing from your template):

Zyxw 12:17, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fix for Neo[edit]

Hey Allstar, Thanks for that quick fix on my page (DL). I must not have been paying attention while I was typing. I appreciate the assistance! Neo16287 22:56, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Allstar86/CV[edit]

Earth Institute[edit]

I do not think the various parts of this center can possibly survive as separate articles. Even at major universities like Columbia, only the most important and comprehensive research centers have individual articles. I have therefore edited them all into redirects to the main page, where it would be reasonable to make sections for each. When there was apparently non-copyvio content, I used it for the section. Before you go to any more work on this elaborate et of pages, please stop and consider. See WP:WALLED GARDEN. Based on practice at AfD, this is probably the best way to handle it. DGG 20:36, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Probably should have made test pages first. People are deleting everything before I can rewrite anything. Stopping for now. --Allstar86 20:46, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will help as much as I can-- if anything actually gets deleted, I'm an admin, so I can undelete it temporarily. No text is actually lost: If you go to the redirects, e.g. Center for the Study of Science and Religion, and look at the edit history, you will see the original text. But make sure it isnt copyvio, the ed. who marked the copyvio will probably check. As for getting copyright permission, it is my experience that Columbia will only give permission for non-Commercial use, which as you know cannot be accepted, But if you think you can get an OK for GFDL, get it and add it back.

Most of what I do here is trying to save bios of major academics and articles about important institutions, & it is my very strong advice that you start by having one strong article, and do not attempt to do separate pages for each of the centers except after the sections get quite large; But of course you know you can disregard anything I say, and try for yourself. DGG 21:01, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think that is great advice. Also, you should find some reliable sources that discuss the Institute and work them into the article ASAP, before someone challenges the whole thing on notability and verifiability grounds. --Butseriouslyfolks 00:53, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good edits today, and now for the refs--and link the directors' names if they are faculty and likely to be notable. And just for some more work, there may be suitable links from some of the subject pages. DGG 02:57, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scrollable references list[edit]

Thanks for bringing that to my attention. Cheers. Do you know of anyway then to stop extra long URL's from spill off the side of pages then? I was never editing long reference lists, just wide ones. Esradekan 22:49, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bullshot poster.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bullshot poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scrolling lists[edit]

Well I have seen in them in some FA and no one complained about them or removed them so I could not realize that they are not allowed.--Avala (talk) 17:59, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List[edit]

Hi Allstar86, thanks for your note. I'll review your list sometime today. All the best. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:01, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that "day" turned into three. Apologies. I've left some comments on the list's talk page. Let me know if I can help further. All the best. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:56, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List[edit]

Well, you can take it to peer review - you'll be guaranteed a review there within three days, but it won't be an expert "list" review. Or, you could go to WP:FLC and nominate it to see what people think. Most of the points I picked up would have been immediately mentioned to you there so you're off to a good start already now you've taken care of them. Let me know if I can help further. All the best. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:06, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NPT list[edit]

Heh - well, after all, there I was expecting to see a list of treaty signatories, but it seems Obamania is ubiquitous these days. Biruitorul ^Talk 04:23, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See my comments on the NPT page. I strongly recommend that you change "signatories" to "parties." NPguy (talk) 04:18, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of parties to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty[edit]

On 28 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article List of parties to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 16:43, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Curitiba hacked.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Curitiba hacked.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:27, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

scrolling lists[edit]

Yeah i noticed they are not allowed anymore, that's why I stopped adding them, cheers EOZyo (мѕğ) 06:06, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Alsek Air Service[edit]

A tag has been placed on Alsek Air Service requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, you got me, that other airline did survive AfD. And this is exactly why I nominated it in the first place, because I was afraid it would open the door to every little tiny local airline in Alaska to have it's own article. Really, how is this notable? How is it more notable than a local water or land taxi? I honestly just don't get it. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:09, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First, let me say I am sympathetic to the cause of not filling up Wikipedia with unimportant junk, so perhaps, if consensus dictates, we can combine some of these smaller airlines into a single article. As to their worthiness, I suppose I believe that public scheduled air service is inherently notable. From that, I believe that any such Alaskan airline that provides such a service, especially essential air service, is worthy of its own article. See Bering Air, Frontier Flying Service, Hageland Aviation Services, Isla Nena Air, Island Air Service, Servant Air, Taquan Air, Warbelow's Air Ventures, and Wings of Alaska, for other examples.

It will likely be that every little public airport in Alaska eventually gets an article, and it's well on its way: see List of airports in Alaska. These airlines serve to connect those dots.

Put another way, I believe the red links on Template:Airlines of the United States and Essential Air Service should be made as articles. I do NOT, however, believe that the hundreds of charter airlines should get their own article.

Given the AFD on Alaska Seaplane Service, I believe I'm in the majority in thinking these little airlines should be kept, but perhaps those more knowledgeable of Wikipedia Policy can argue the case better than I. In any case, I think this is something that should be debated and not speedy-deleted. I'm always up to talking this through, and perhaps the people at WP:AIRPORTS can be helpful too. --Allstar86 (talk) 06:37, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, I thought the keep voters at that AfD mostly labored under the highly mistaken notion that little tiny airplanes are the main way everyone gets around in Alaska, and willfully ignored my evidence to the contrary. Here's an example: [1] these guys have the same passanger capacity, and operate on a regular shedule but they use vans instead of airplanes. Are they notable? Also, this article does not cite any sources. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:53, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Alsek Air Service[edit]

I have nominated Alsek Air Service, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alsek Air Service. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. SchuminWeb (Talk) 09:24, 3 October 2008 (UTC) SchuminWeb (Talk) 09:24, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Essential Air Service updates[edit]

Thanks for updating the tables in the Essential Air Service article. Having added the first table two years ago, I can appreciate how much work was involved. Although the current Alaska chart at http://ostpxweb.dot.gov/aviation/X-50%20Role_files/080801alaska.htm still shows Icy Bay and Cape Yakataga as having service to Cordova, the actual orders (see PDF links at Order 2006-9-22 and Order 2008-7-28) from the U.S. Department of Transporation show that the destination changed to Yakutat in November 2006 when Alsek Air Service started provided EAS services. I've updated the EAS and airport articles to reflect this change, but wanted to let you know in case there's some other source you know of that says otherwise. -- Zyxw (talk) 09:08, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NPT parties[edit]

Hi Allstar, well done on the parties to treaty pages especially the NPT and CTBT articles. For the NPT, could we please have distinction of the colors on the map between NWS and NNWS after all this is arguably the most importance distinction of the treaty. Poliphile (talk) 03:19, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Allstar86! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 942 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Ana Mathis - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer granted[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:10, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ana Mathis[edit]

The article Ana Mathis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find sources to show notability or verify content. Not on IMDB, either

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Milowent • ^talkblp-r 20:10, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No objection; was copied over from a moved article --Allstar86 (talk) 05:38, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled[edit]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 14:00, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Island Air Service for deletion[edit]

The article Island Air Service is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Island Air Service until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Beeblebrox (talk) 08:35, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alsek Air Service for deletion[edit]

The article Alsek Air Service is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alsek Air Service until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:05, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Taquan Air for deletion[edit]

The article Taquan Air is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taquan Air until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:19, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:USBill[edit]

Hi, Allstar. Thanks for your work to improve Template:USBill. I notice, though, that your 1 July 2011 edit has left the now-current version with this error text at the top of the page:

Expression error: Unrecognised punctuation character "{" {{{2}}} {{{3}}} Expression error: Unrecognised punctuation character "{"

You might like to have a look. Best, – OhioStandard (talk) 16:09, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of parties to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty[edit]

Hi All-star,

Great job with getting List of parties to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty up to featured list status! I have nominated the article to go up on the main page in the Today's Featured List section. Some concerns about the article have been raised here. If you are willing to help address these concerns, it would be greatly appreciated.

Neelix (talk) 21:34, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom of speech = New WikiProject[edit]

WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech

Hi there, Allstar86, thank you for your helpful edit to Portal:Freedom of speech/Topics! :)

I've recently gone ahead and created WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech. If you're interested, here are some easy things you can do:

List yourself as a participant in the WikiProject, by adding your username here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Freedom_of_speech#Participants.
Add userbox {{User Freedom of speech}} to your userpage, which lists you as a member of the WikiProject.
Tag relevant talk pages of articles and other relevant pages using {{WikiProject Freedom of speech}}.
Join in discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Freedom of speech.
Notify others you think might be interested in Freedom of speech to join the WikiProject.

Thank you for your interest in Freedom of speech, — Cirt (talk) 01:24, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Susquehanna Bank[edit]

The article Susquehanna Bank has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 05:22, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ponca City airport[edit]

I was looking at the Ponca City airport page and did not see any references in the History section. I thought rather than tagging it, I would just bring it to your attention as the page seems to be one of those you are working on. Okheric (talk) 16:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Allstar86. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Allstar86. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Allstar86. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Allstar86. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Allstar86. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monterey Regional Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page JSX. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Center for Climate Systems Research for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Center for Climate Systems Research is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for Climate Systems Research until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Femke (talk) 16:17, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]