Talk:Autonomist Marxism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Regarding this edit: Saying that autonomism "developed Marxism" sounds perilously close to a pro-autonomist bias to me (it sounds like a claim that autonomism is better developed than other forms of Marxist thought). It looks like this sentence's main point is to outline the main emphases and concerns of autonomism, not to make a claim about its development, so I'm going to try rewording it. Changes are always welcome, of course. -- Rbellin|Talk 00:08, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Heh. I didn't mean to imply correctness, but rather progress in terms of areas of argument. Your version is superior! Fifelfoo 03:13, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)


That stub is for 'communist party' related pages, which seems inaccurate (part of the 'autonomy' of autonomist marxism is autonomy from the party). There doesn't seem to be a stub template for general communism related pages.

POV Problems[edit]

Needs some work....ie. "it is based upon how working class people actually resist capitalism."

That's a case where, at most, a little rewording is necessary. It isn't an NPOV dispute and does not require a clunking great NPOV notice on the article page. Mattley (Chattley) 09:58, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Title name: "autonomism" or "autonomist marxism"?[edit]

Shouldn't the article be titled autonomism? I noticed there is an overlapping article, autonome, which is a translation of the French and German terms and refers more to the anarchist side of autonomism. Autonomism allows for both the more precise marxist doctrine and the social autonomism anarchist movement to be included. Tazmaniacs 15:16, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]