User talk:Pseudo daoist

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pseudo_daoist.

This is Pseudo daoist's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Responses[edit]

If I write a comment on your talk page, please respond there, not here.jonathon (talk) 20:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphology Talk[edit]

Please put comments about Graphology in this block.jonathon 22:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

e-Sword Talk[edit]

Please put comments about e-Sword in this block.jonathon 22:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relgiously Orientated Distributions[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pseudo_daoist/Religious_Distros is the current draft for the proposed religiously Orientated Distributions page.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pseudo_daoist/Bible_study_Software is a draft for a page. I didn't know about Bible software when I started my draft.jonathon (talk) 20:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notes for New Users[edit]

Deletion Guidelines[edit]

Unofficial guidelines

WP:CONG : Notable churches or congregation
WP:SCHOOL : Notable Schools

jonathon (talk) 21:55, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Everything Else[edit]

If a comment doesn't belong in a category listed above, put it here.jonathon 22:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Psychogram for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Psychogram is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychogram until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 14:54, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:E-Sword 9 7 1 screenshot.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:E-Sword 9 7 1 screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Pseudo daoist. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment[edit]

Churches of Christ has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Iskandar323 (talk) 15:09, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]