Talk:European Space Agency

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeEuropean Space Agency was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 21, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
In the newsA news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on October 22, 2018.

Refs[edit]

why are the headquarters shown on hover instead of the logo?[edit]

just feel like it'd make more sense when hovering on the ESA for it to show the logo, not sure how to change it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackbirdxd (talkcontribs) 14:34, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Statistics[edit]

Includes the France launches (those before 1979)

Number of launches by year
Year Launches Success Failure
2020 5 4 1
2019 6 5 1
2018 8 7 1
2017 9 9 0
2016 9 9 0
2015 9 9 0
2014 7 7 0
2013 5 5 0
2012 8 8 0
2011 5 5 0
2010 6 6 0
2009 7 7 0
2008 6 6 0
2007 6 6 0
2006 5 5 0
2005 5 5 0
2004 3 3 0
2003 4 4 0
2002 12 11 1
2001 8 7 1
2000 12 12 0
1999 10 10 0
1998 11 11 0
1997 12 11 1
1996 11 10 1
1995 11 11 0
1994 8 6 2
1993 7 7 0
1992 7 7 0
1991 8 8 0
1990 6 5 1
1989 7 7 0
1988 7 7 0
1987 2 2 0
1986 3 2 1
1985 4 3 1
1984 4 4 0
1983 2 2 0
1982 1 0 1
1981 2 2 0
1980 1 0 1
1979 1 1 0
1975 3 3 0
1973 1 0 1
1971 3 1 2
1970 3 2 1
1969 1 0 1
1968 1 0 1
1967 2 2 0
1966 1 1 0
1965 1 1 0
  • Total number of launches: 286 in 56 years = 5.1 launches per year
  • Success: 266 (93%)
  • Failure: 20
  • Max launches in one year: 12 launches in 1997, 2000 and 2002
  • Max successful launches in one year: 12 launches in 2000
  • Max satellites on a single launch: 53 satellites on a Vega rocket on 3 September 2020
  • 95 consecutive successful launches between these two failures: 11 Dec 2002 - Ariane 5ECA - Hot Bird 7 - and - 25 Jan 2018 - Ariane 5ECA - Al Yah 3
  • 40 consecutive successful launches between these two failures: 30 Oct 1997 - Ariane 5G - TEAMSAT - and - 12 Jul 2001 - Ariane 5G - Artemis
  • 26 consecutive successful launches between these two failures: 22 Feb 1990 - Ariane 44L - Superbird B - and - 24 Jan 1994 - Ariane 44LP - Eutelsat 2 F5

Barecode (talk) 05:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Statistics - excluding France launches[edit]

Number of launches by year
Year Launches Success Failure
2020 5 4 1
2019 6 5 1
2018 8 7 1
2017 9 9 0
2016 9 9 0
2015 9 9 0
2014 7 7 0
2013 5 5 0
2012 8 8 0
2011 5 5 0
2010 6 6 0
2009 7 7 0
2008 6 6 0
2007 6 6 0
2006 5 5 0
2005 5 5 0
2004 3 3 0
2003 4 4 0
2002 12 11 1
2001 8 7 1
2000 12 12 0
1999 10 10 0
1998 11 11 0
1997 12 11 1
1996 11 10 1
1995 11 11 0
1994 8 6 2
1993 7 7 0
1992 7 7 0
1991 8 8 0
1990 6 5 1
1989 7 7 0
1988 7 7 0
1987 2 2 0
1986 3 2 1
1985 4 3 1
1984 4 4 0
1983 2 2 0
1982 1 0 1
1981 2 2 0
1980 1 0 1
1979 1 1 0
1971 1 0 1
1970 1 0 1
1969 1 0 1
1968 1 0 1
  • Total number of launches: 274 in 53 years = 5.1 launches per year
  • Success: 256 (93.4 %)
  • Failure: 18

Barecode (talk) 15:32, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Proposed) External links modified (February 2021)[edit]

Hello Fellow Wikipedians,

Posting these updates as proposals and ask that someone review and actually make the edits, as I wish to avoid updating the ESA page myself.

References 4, 14, and 34 under External Links should be updated to point to either:

1. The pocket edition publication: https://www.esa.int/About_Us/ESA_Publications/ESA_Publications_Monographs/ESA_Convention_booklet

or

2. About the Convention itself as a legal document: https://www.esa.int/About_Us/Law_at_ESA/ESA_Convention

Cheers! Danno612 09:06, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Danno612 (talkcontribs) 08:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply] 

Logo showing flag of Slovenia instead of Slovakia[edit]

It's a story as old as time, or at least as old as 1992, but somebody confused Slovenia and Slovakia. The logo shows the flag of SlovENIA, although it isn't a member of ESA, SlovAKIA is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.1.214.77 (talkcontribs)

reflist|group=note|refs=[edit]

In two different parts of the article, reflist|group=note|refs= is in the body rather than in the references section. I hadn't seen that before. If that type of setup is okay, then I'll leave that alone. It seems to work for this article. GBFEE (talk) 18:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 19 December 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Per consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 14:47, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


European Space AgencyESA – From a comparison at Google Trends linked here, there is a significant higher search of "ESA" compared with "European Space Agency". Thus, I find this move reasonable. Any objections to this move? Thanks, Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 14:32, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support: Seems reasonable per MOS:ACROTITLE. YorkshireExpat (talk) 23:35, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Indeed often referred to as the ESA, but certainly not exclusively. This is a similar situation to not renaming Royal Air Force to RAF, United States Air Force to USAF, Special Air Service to SAS, etc. The abbreviation may be a little more commonly seen, but the full title is still very well-known. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:44, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The determination for when an initialism becomes dominant enough in usage to warrant being the article title is a bit subjective, but I don't think the ESA has quite reached that point yet. Rreagan007 (talk) 17:21, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Britannica uses the full name. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:07, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:52, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Update ESA_Labs@ section[edit]

There are several more ESA_Labs@ created the last few years that should be added to the section. Roger (talk) 09:01, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]