User talk:Del Trotter

I appreciate that you feel that the article on Searchlight magazine is rather biased in favour of the magazine views. I think it is too. However, reverting it back to a version that uses blatantly POV terms like 'jewish thug groups', and additionally removes vaulable information, is not the way to go about restoring balance. It will simply be reverted, and will achieve nothing. This is the reality such changes will bring about; I'm sure you could make more constructive changes that remove bias from this article without tipping th balance too far in the opposite direction. 80.255 16:54, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Smoddy (t) (e) 14:36, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

---

You're being very counterproductive, you know. Legitimate material critical of Searchlight is being removed from the Searchlight magazine article as a result of your intransigent reverting. People who would rather see such criticism removed are subtly removing it under the cover of reverting your nonsense. Unless you want to see the article turned into a pro-searchlight manisfesto, please start editing sensibly. 80.255 15:44, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)