Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Category:Terrorism
The following discussion comes from Wikipedia:Categories for deletion. With one vote to delete and two to keep, the consensus was to keep the category, though it may need POV work. (Note: In answer to IZAK's comment, the entry for "Terrorism" under unresolved does not refer to this category itself but rather to other categories related to terrorism.) -Aranel ("Sarah") 19:26, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Bizarre list of articles which are entirely from the point of view of the US. - Xed 17:56, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I propose fixing the list rather than killing the category. --Gary D 23:03, Dec 1, 2004 (UTC)
NOTE: There was already a VOTE on this a few weeks ago and the vote was to KEEP because it was UNRESOLVED see Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/unresolved#Terrorism [1], why is this here again now? IZAK 13:20, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep nearly everyone agrees on the existence of Terrorism. Disagreement revolves around which acts are and which acts are not. Lance6Wins 21:19, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. The solution to systemic POV is not to curtail information, but to add more. -Willmcw 00:18, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)