Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pup Named Charlie

Pup Named Charlie[edit]

I think this is a hoax. --jpgordon {gab} 04:39, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)

With nothing even remotely matching on IMDb, I think you're right. Delete. Ian Pugh 05:10, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete - Doesn't exist. Interesting hoax, though! ClockworkTroll 05:11, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete; self-defensive hoax. Eventually hoaxers are going to find much better formulas, and we'll have to develop much better defenses; a bit like the history of codes and code-breaking. — Bill 12:40, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete as hoax. GRider 21:26, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Bogus. -R. S. Shaw 22:43, 2004 Oct 19 (UTC)
Delete unless an external link is added which verifies its existence. (See RickK, I vote delete sometimes) anthony (see warning) 23:26, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete. alleged is a classic "weasel word". --Ianb 23:20, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Where is the text? This is not a speedy delete is it? Then why is there still an entry on vfd, when the article is blanked? I remember the recent Terry Teene discussion, where his entry was deleted despite being nominated to the Rock and Roll hall of fame, and his having written and performed more songs than Madonna... simply because there was 'no mention of him on the web'... though his albums are still fetching 10 times their original retail value in good condition, and one of his songs being played every Hallowe'en by Dr. Demento. I'd like a chance to see the article before I vote. That's The Way We Do Things Here, right?Pedant 01:01, 2004 Oct 24 (UTC)
- Amen The bellman 08:43, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
You're both correct. However, this is non-existent and is therefore a speedy candidate. Admins, can one of you please repost the text here in the discuaasion? Frankly, I'm curious and these bogus articles couched as fact worry me. I vote delete no matter what. - Lucky 6.9 05:32, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)