Talk:Area codes 561 and 728

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Discussion[edit]

I don't think the description is correct; I believe until the 1990s all area codes had a 1 or 0 as the middle digit, so that 561 can't possibly be "one of the oldest area codes". I currently live in Palm Beach County, but I've only lived here about five years, so I don't know its area-code history. Dtobias 23:58, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)

305 split into 407 and 305 in 1988. In 1996, 407 itself split to become 407 and 561. In 2002, 561 split to become 561 and 772. (407 also split at other times; so did 305; but that's not relevant here.) All this information can be found at www.lincmad.com/newareacodes.html; the lincmad.com Web site has a wealth of information on area codes in the NANP. So you're right, Dtobias: 561 only dates from 1996.msh210 17:53, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
In fact, www.lincmad.com/cities_d-l.html indicates that the article's contention that 561 "encompasses the entire Palm Beach County, and nothing more" is false. I'm gonna fix it now.msh210 23:46, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Area code 561. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:48, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]