Talk:Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry

Japan Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 18:27, April 23, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Trade Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The error message should just say "this article was written by a Japanese person." This is how Japanese sounds in English, just edit it yourself and take out the vague words and the promotional words. This article's header should probablly just be deleted as it doesn't say anything usefull. The name in Japanese Kanji is probablly the only usefull part in this whole article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.8.119.134 (talk) 06:53, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your change because I didn't see any evidence of "vague words" or "promotional words", what are you even talking about, seriously. Skeletos (talk) 20:01, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information-Technology Promotion Agency[edit]

The paragraph under the headline "Information-Technology Promotion Agency" is of little relevance to the articles main topic, is not supported by references, and is written from a point of view of someone within the agency. It is merely a criticism of previous government reforms to one agency with minor relevance to he METI, the paragraph even says so it self. I suggest it for deletion.Doktork (talk) 13:07, 1 December 2018 (UTC+9)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

経済産業省.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:24, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]